Did Henry Ford Cause the Recession of 1926–1927? A Test of the Granular Hypothesis

ABSTRACT In May 1927, Henry Ford shut down all new automobile production at the Ford Motor Corporation to retool for the transition from the Model T to the Model A. This shutdown has been connected to the coincident 1926–1927 recession. The granular hypothesis of Gabaix argues that large shocks to major firms can generate recessions, and this episode provides a quasi‐experiment, as Ford was one of the largest American firms in 1927. We examine the granular hypothesis in this context and find that shutdown dates do not correspond to structural breaks. Moreover, the implied granular shock is much larger than the actual economic decline. Other car companies, especially General Motors' Chevrolet, took advantage of the shutdown to take market share from Ford, offsetting any decline in automobile production. The recession was well underway by that time, and we detect little change in economic activity corresponding to the Ford shutdown.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Southern Economic Journal
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12791
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Did Henry Ford Cause the Recession of 1926–1927? A Test of the Granular Hypothesis

Stephen Teng Sun, Gabriel Mathy
Southern Economic Journal
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
article

Did Henry Ford Cause the Recession of 1926–1927? A Test of the Granular Hypothesis

Stephen Teng Sun, Gabriel Mathy
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In May 1927, Henry Ford shut down all new automobile production at the Ford Motor Corporation to retool for the transition from the Model T to the Model A. This shutdown has been connected to the coincident 1926–1927 recession. The granular hypothesis of Gabaix argues that large shocks to major firms can generate recessions, and this episode provides a quasi‐experiment, as Ford was one of the largest American firms in 1927. We examine the granular hypothesis in this context and find that shutdown dates do not correspond to structural breaks. Moreover, the implied granular shock is much larger than the actual economic decline. Other car companies, especially General Motors' Chevrolet, took advantage of the shutdown to take market share from Ford, offsetting any decline in automobile production. The recession was well underway by that time, and we detect little change in economic activity corresponding to the Ford shutdown.

Southern Economic JournalVol. 92(2)
American University (US), Nevada Department of Health and Human Services (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.