Mapping Out the Context

Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can write humanlike, context-aware messages and thus can aid individuals in their communication with others. Existing research suggests that using GenAI may be regarded as inappropriate or undesirable in certain interpersonal contexts, but acceptable in others. Yet, few studies have articulated the reasons underlying such context-dependent preferences. Taking a functional approach, we conducted an online survey ( N = 542) to explore how GenAI use might depend on an individual’s goals in interpersonal communication and to unravel the reasons why an individual may or may not use GenAI in specific contexts. Among the participants who had used GenAI in their interpersonal communication with others ( n = 240), we found that GenAI was most often used for goals of information and resource exchange. When message production for a goal requires more of one’s subjective experience (e.g., providing emotional support, showing others who you are), individuals are less likely to use GenAI in such contexts. Other contextual factors, including whether message production for a goal is difficult and whether it requires objectivity or human knowledge, were not found to predict GenAI use. These findings contribute to the theories and research in human–AI interaction and message production, while also informing the future design of human-centered AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000487
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping Out the Context

Lewen Wei, Andrew Gambino, Bingjie Liu
Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

Mapping Out the Context

Lewen Wei, Andrew Gambino, Bingjie Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can write humanlike, context-aware messages and thus can aid individuals in their communication with others. Existing research suggests that using GenAI may be regarded as inappropriate or undesirable in certain interpersonal contexts, but acceptable in others. Yet, few studies have articulated the reasons underlying such context-dependent preferences. Taking a functional approach, we conducted an online survey ( N = 542) to explore how GenAI use might depend on an individual’s goals in interpersonal communication and to unravel the reasons why an individual may or may not use GenAI in specific contexts. Among the participants who had used GenAI in their interpersonal communication with others ( n = 240), we found that GenAI was most often used for goals of information and resource exchange. When message production for a goal requires more of one’s subjective experience (e.g., providing emotional support, showing others who you are), individuals are less likely to use GenAI in such contexts. Other contextual factors, including whether message production for a goal is difficult and whether it requires objectivity or human knowledge, were not found to predict GenAI use. These findings contribute to the theories and research in human–AI interaction and message production, while also informing the future design of human-centered AI.

Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications
UNSW Sydney (AU), The Ohio State University (US), University of Delaware (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.