A guide to the mechanisms of transformation: The role of materials in cognitive change

Abstract Despite the clear divisions in current archaeological theories, in the last 30 years a ‘new consensus’ is emerging; this is the recognition that materials can actively shape human behaviour and cognition. While this recognition offers major opportunities for explaining changes in the archaeological record without just succumbing to individual simplistic models – such as migration or diffusion, or acculturation or convergence – there is still a need to formulate a framework that allows schematising this new consensus into our classifications and analyses of archaeological materials. Our paper aims to take a first step in this direction by formalising some mechanisms through which human behaviour and cognition can be modified by the material world. Operating at the interstices between theories about material engagement, cognition, and practice, three mechanisms of transformation are formalised, i.e., visual enchantment, mechanical degradation and obtrusion. As a further step to integrate these mechanisms, we stress the need to factor in human expectations, the changing states of materials and contingent situations into our schematisations and reconstructions of human–material relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeological Dialogues
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1380203825100159
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A guide to the mechanisms of transformation: The role of materials in cognitive change

Bruno Vindrola-Padrós, Kata Furholt, Lizzie Scholtus, Johannes Müller
1 citations
Archaeological Dialogues
Embodied and Extended Cognition
1.43
article

A guide to the mechanisms of transformation: The role of materials in cognitive change

Bruno Vindrola-Padrós, Kata Furholt, Lizzie Scholtus, Johannes Müller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Despite the clear divisions in current archaeological theories, in the last 30 years a ‘new consensus’ is emerging; this is the recognition that materials can actively shape human behaviour and cognition. While this recognition offers major opportunities for explaining changes in the archaeological record without just succumbing to individual simplistic models – such as migration or diffusion, or acculturation or convergence – there is still a need to formulate a framework that allows schematising this new consensus into our classifications and analyses of archaeological materials. Our paper aims to take a first step in this direction by formalising some mechanisms through which human behaviour and cognition can be modified by the material world. Operating at the interstices between theories about material engagement, cognition, and practice, three mechanisms of transformation are formalised, i.e., visual enchantment, mechanical degradation and obtrusion. As a further step to integrate these mechanisms, we stress the need to factor in human expectations, the changing states of materials and contingent situations into our schematisations and reconstructions of human–material relations.

Archaeological Dialogues
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), Active Technologies (Italy) (IT), Medscape (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A guide to the mechanisms of transformation: The role of materials in cognitive change — Bruno Vindrola-Padrós, Kata Furholt, et al. · Archaeological Dialogues (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS