Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Meniscal Tears

Background The knee menisci are fibrocartilaginous structures that play a key biomechanical role in load transmission, shock absorption, stability, and, ultimately, preservation of articular cartilage. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is vital in the assessment of meniscal pathology and guiding subsequent management options. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for isolated meniscal tears compared to subsequent arthroscopic findings. Methodology This observational study screened 334 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery. Preoperative knee MRI scan results using standardized and uniform protocols were compared to arthroscopic surgical findings to assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of initial radiological reports. Results A total of 79 patients who underwent arthroscopy for isolated meniscal tears were included in the analysis. MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 83%, PPV of 96%, NPV of 63%, and accuracy of 89% for medial meniscal tears. In lateral meniscal tears, preoperative MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 88%, PPV of 68%, NPV of 87%, and accuracy of 81%. Conclusions This study demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy of MRI scans for both medial and lateral meniscal tears. However, radiological findings should not be used in isolation, but instead incorporated as a diagnostic adjunct in the wider clinical picture when making therapeutic decisions. Clinical acumen remains the priority in the context of evaluating these knee injuries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.92155
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Meniscal Tears

Oday Al‐Dadah, James Bottomley
1 citations
Cureus
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
2.01
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Meniscal Tears

Oday Al‐Dadah, James Bottomley
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background The knee menisci are fibrocartilaginous structures that play a key biomechanical role in load transmission, shock absorption, stability, and, ultimately, preservation of articular cartilage. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is vital in the assessment of meniscal pathology and guiding subsequent management options. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for isolated meniscal tears compared to subsequent arthroscopic findings. Methodology This observational study screened 334 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery. Preoperative knee MRI scan results using standardized and uniform protocols were compared to arthroscopic surgical findings to assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of initial radiological reports. Results A total of 79 patients who underwent arthroscopy for isolated meniscal tears were included in the analysis. MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 83%, PPV of 96%, NPV of 63%, and accuracy of 89% for medial meniscal tears. In lateral meniscal tears, preoperative MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 88%, PPV of 68%, NPV of 87%, and accuracy of 81%. Conclusions This study demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy of MRI scans for both medial and lateral meniscal tears. However, radiological findings should not be used in isolation, but instead incorporated as a diagnostic adjunct in the wider clinical picture when making therapeutic decisions. Clinical acumen remains the priority in the context of evaluating these knee injuries.

CureusVol. 17(9)
South Tyneside District Hospital (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.