Constitutive modelling of crushable soil behaviour by conjugating hyperelasticity and bounding surface plasticity: from theory to application

In this paper, a constitutive model for crushable soils is developed with two main objectives: first, the elastic formulation is described within a hyperelastic framework that ensures one-to-one stress–strain relations derived from an energy potential, where a closed strain loop results in a closed stress cycle with zero energy dissipation. The second is to derive the constitutive equations in the full tensorial domain rather than the triaxial plane, allowing the model to be implemented in three-dimensional finite-element codes. To achieve this, hyperelastic equations are derived from a modified energy potential and the concept of elastoplastic coupling is considered. In this context, the breakage index acts as a coupling variable that captures the influence of plastic strain on the elastic stiffness tensor of soils. The hyperelastic description of the material is then conjugated with a state-dependent bounding surface plasticity model to capture the soil response in a hyperelastic–plastic framework. The influence of particle breakage on the stress–strain response of soils is incorporated by adjusting the critical state void ratio with the change in grain size caused by crushing. The performance of the model in capturing the small-strain behaviour of soils at different initial stress ratios is first evaluated using the concept of response envelopes. Then, a series of monotonic and cyclic triaxial tests are simulated on three different soils and the predictions are compared with laboratory results. The comparative analysis of the results shows a satisfactory agreement between the model predictions and the experimental data. After validation of the model with element tests, the model is implemented in Abaqus as a user-defined material routine to analyse the behaviour of a monopile and a strip foundation under loading. The qualitative comparison between experimental results and simulations shows good agreement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Géotechnique
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.24.01201
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constitutive modelling of crushable soil behaviour by conjugating hyperelasticity and bounding surface plasticity: from theory to application

Merita Tafili, Torsten Wichtmann, Mohammad Salimi, Nazanin Irani et al.
Géotechnique
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
article

Constitutive modelling of crushable soil behaviour by conjugating hyperelasticity and bounding surface plasticity: from theory to application

Merita Tafili, Torsten Wichtmann, Mohammad Salimi, Nazanin Irani, T. Triantafyllidis
article en

Abstract

In this paper, a constitutive model for crushable soils is developed with two main objectives: first, the elastic formulation is described within a hyperelastic framework that ensures one-to-one stress–strain relations derived from an energy potential, where a closed strain loop results in a closed stress cycle with zero energy dissipation. The second is to derive the constitutive equations in the full tensorial domain rather than the triaxial plane, allowing the model to be implemented in three-dimensional finite-element codes. To achieve this, hyperelastic equations are derived from a modified energy potential and the concept of elastoplastic coupling is considered. In this context, the breakage index acts as a coupling variable that captures the influence of plastic strain on the elastic stiffness tensor of soils. The hyperelastic description of the material is then conjugated with a state-dependent bounding surface plasticity model to capture the soil response in a hyperelastic–plastic framework. The influence of particle breakage on the stress–strain response of soils is incorporated by adjusting the critical state void ratio with the change in grain size caused by crushing. The performance of the model in capturing the small-strain behaviour of soils at different initial stress ratios is first evaluated using the concept of response envelopes. Then, a series of monotonic and cyclic triaxial tests are simulated on three different soils and the predictions are compared with laboratory results. The comparative analysis of the results shows a satisfactory agreement between the model predictions and the experimental data. After validation of the model with element tests, the model is implemented in Abaqus as a user-defined material routine to analyse the behaviour of a monopile and a strip foundation under loading. The qualitative comparison between experimental results and simulations shows good agreement.

GéotechniqueVol. 75(12)
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.