How Genotype-by-Environment Interactions Can Maintain Variation in Mutualisms

AbstractCoevolution requires reciprocal genotype-by-genotype (G × G) interactions for fitness, which occur when the fitness of a genotype in one species depends on the genotype it interacts with in another species and vice versa. However, in mutualisms, when G × G interactions are mutually beneficial, simple models predict that the resulting positive feedbacks will erode genetic variation. Here, we explore how genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions, which occur when the fitnesses of different genotypes respond differently to different environments, and G × G × E interactions, which occur when the environment changes the outcome of G × G interactions, maintain variation in mutualisms. We build a spatial population genetic model in which the fitnesses of two partners depend on mutually beneficial G × G, G × E, and G × G × E interactions. Our analysis shows that variation will always be maintained via migration-selection balance with stronger G × E than G × G interactions. However, strong G × G interactions can erode variation by allowing genotypically matched partners to fix, and, more surprisingly, weak G × G interactions can erode variation by allowing genotypically mismatched partners to fix at high dispersal rates, leading to apparent maladaptation between partners. We parameterize our model using data from three published reciprocal transplant experiments, infer the relative strengths of G × E and G × G, and discuss the implications for the maintenance of genetic variation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Naturalist
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/738501
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Genotype-by-Environment Interactions Can Maintain Variation in Mutualisms

Christopher Carlson, Matthew M. Osmond, Megan E. Frederickson
The American Naturalist
Plant and animal studies
article

How Genotype-by-Environment Interactions Can Maintain Variation in Mutualisms

Christopher Carlson, Matthew M. Osmond, Megan E. Frederickson
article en

Abstract

AbstractCoevolution requires reciprocal genotype-by-genotype (G × G) interactions for fitness, which occur when the fitness of a genotype in one species depends on the genotype it interacts with in another species and vice versa. However, in mutualisms, when G × G interactions are mutually beneficial, simple models predict that the resulting positive feedbacks will erode genetic variation. Here, we explore how genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions, which occur when the fitnesses of different genotypes respond differently to different environments, and G × G × E interactions, which occur when the environment changes the outcome of G × G interactions, maintain variation in mutualisms. We build a spatial population genetic model in which the fitnesses of two partners depend on mutually beneficial G × G, G × E, and G × G × E interactions. Our analysis shows that variation will always be maintained via migration-selection balance with stronger G × E than G × G interactions. However, strong G × G interactions can erode variation by allowing genotypically matched partners to fix, and, more surprisingly, weak G × G interactions can erode variation by allowing genotypically mismatched partners to fix at high dispersal rates, leading to apparent maladaptation between partners. We parameterize our model using data from three published reciprocal transplant experiments, infer the relative strengths of G × E and G × G, and discuss the implications for the maintenance of genetic variation.

The American NaturalistVol. 207(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.