Nudging fails to increase conservation actions among farmers

This paper presents findings from a randomized field experiment with over 7,200 Swedish farmers, evaluating the effectiveness of a behavioral nudge aimed at increasing engagement with a biodiversity conservation advisory service. The treatment group received a postcard featuring a peer farmer's testimonial and photo, highlighting the ease and benefits of adopting conservation practices. The control group received standard campaign materials from the national farming board. The intervention combined elements of salience, (peer) messenger effects, and social norms, but had no measurable effect on farmers' likelihood of requesting an advisory audit, the key first step toward participation in a new agri-environmental scheme. Exploratory subgroup analysis, however, reveals suggestive evidence that the nudge may have been more effective among female farmers and those already engaged in biodiversity efforts. Overall, these results suggest that behavioral nudges may have limited impact in promoting voluntary uptake of sustainable farming practices. Implications for the design of behavioral interventions in agricultural policy are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Economics
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frevc.2025.1648280
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nudging fails to increase conservation actions among farmers

Anna Nordén, Elisabeth Gsottbauer, Miquel Correa
Frontiers in Environmental Economics
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Nudging fails to increase conservation actions among farmers

Anna Nordén, Elisabeth Gsottbauer, Miquel Correa
article en

Abstract

This paper presents findings from a randomized field experiment with over 7,200 Swedish farmers, evaluating the effectiveness of a behavioral nudge aimed at increasing engagement with a biodiversity conservation advisory service. The treatment group received a postcard featuring a peer farmer's testimonial and photo, highlighting the ease and benefits of adopting conservation practices. The control group received standard campaign materials from the national farming board. The intervention combined elements of salience, (peer) messenger effects, and social norms, but had no measurable effect on farmers' likelihood of requesting an advisory audit, the key first step toward participation in a new agri-environmental scheme. Exploratory subgroup analysis, however, reveals suggestive evidence that the nudge may have been more effective among female farmers and those already engaged in biodiversity efforts. Overall, these results suggest that behavioral nudges may have limited impact in promoting voluntary uptake of sustainable farming practices. Implications for the design of behavioral interventions in agricultural policy are discussed.

Frontiers in Environmental EconomicsVol. 4
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Committee on Climate Change (GB), X-Fab (Germany) (DE), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB), Jönköping University (SE)
Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nudging fails to increase conservation actions among farmers — Anna Nordén, Elisabeth Gsottbauer, et al. · Frontiers in Environmental Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS