Multidimensional Perovskite Solar Cells: What's Next after 3D/2D?

Abstract Integrating 2D with 3D perovskites is widespread in the perovskite solar cell community. There are different strategies to create 2D/3D interfaces, and they have in common an increase in device performance and stability due to defect passivation at the grain boundaries and the formation of a protective capping layer. However, there is a growing concern about the stability of the 2D/3D interface, particularly regarding the dynamic nature of this interface, which can lead to phase conversion and/or degradation of the 2D phase. Given the challenges associated with 2D/3D interfaces, realizing other low‐dimensional systems, such as 1D/3D and 0D/3D, has attracted the research community's attention. Although still in the early stages of development, these new strategies seem promising as they can passivate trap states and increase the stability of the 3D phase while providing a more structurally stable interface. This perspective delves into the interface of 1D and 0D perovskites with 3D, highlighting their opportunities and challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Energy Materials
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202502686
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Perovskite Materials and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multidimensional Perovskite Solar Cells: What's Next after 3D/2D?

Lucas Scalon, Yana Vaynzof
4 citations
Advanced Energy Materials
Perovskite Materials and Applications
2.92
article

Multidimensional Perovskite Solar Cells: What's Next after 3D/2D?

Lucas Scalon, Yana Vaynzof
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Integrating 2D with 3D perovskites is widespread in the perovskite solar cell community. There are different strategies to create 2D/3D interfaces, and they have in common an increase in device performance and stability due to defect passivation at the grain boundaries and the formation of a protective capping layer. However, there is a growing concern about the stability of the 2D/3D interface, particularly regarding the dynamic nature of this interface, which can lead to phase conversion and/or degradation of the 2D phase. Given the challenges associated with 2D/3D interfaces, realizing other low‐dimensional systems, such as 1D/3D and 0D/3D, has attracted the research community's attention. Although still in the early stages of development, these new strategies seem promising as they can passivate trap states and increase the stability of the 3D phase while providing a more structurally stable interface. This perspective delves into the interface of 1D and 0D perovskites with 3D, highlighting their opportunities and challenges.

Advanced Energy MaterialsVol. 15(44)
Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Perovskite Materials and Applications
2.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.