Taking the Translational Science Benefits Model from concept to operationalization: opportunities and challenges in defining impact using the Translational Science Benefits Model

The Translational Science Benefits Model (TSBM) was developed to conceptualize and communicate the benefits and impact of translational research. While the TSBM was developed as a conceptual model rather than an operational process, it can be integrated into operational processes to provide evidence and clearly explain the impact of translational research and translational science. This paper discusses the use of the TSBM not only as a conceptual framework but also as a program-integrated operational mechanism. First, it discusses three TSBM-informed programmatic processes for addressing intended and achieved impact: case studies, Pilots program reporting, and an organizational database. Then, it outlines the key factors emerging from these processes that should be considered before employing TSBM as an integrated structure for collecting information on translational research outcomes. In particular, this paper discusses key <i>who</i> questions with a focus on who codes or reports TSBM data, including accounting for the coder or reporter's understanding of the TSBM, while balancing feasibility with validity. Key <i>how</i> questions including a specific focus on how potential TSBM outcomes are defined and determined. Key <i>when</i> questions address potential limitations or adaptation needs in TSBM-based measurement based on specific areas of focus, particularly workforce development and translational science-specific outcomes. Ultimately, this paper provides key lessons to consider when using the TSBM as a data collection tool and also explores opportunities to expand the utility of the TSBM as a data collection tool to understand, demonstrate, and augment the impact of translational research and science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612590
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taking the Translational Science Benefits Model from concept to operationalization: opportunities and challenges in defining impact using the Translational Science Benefits Model

Jessica B. Sperling, Stella Quenstedt, Eman Ghanem, Tarun Saxena
Frontiers in Public Health
Health and Medical Research Impacts
article

Taking the Translational Science Benefits Model from concept to operationalization: opportunities and challenges in defining impact using the Translational Science Benefits Model

Jessica B. Sperling, Stella Quenstedt, Eman Ghanem, Tarun Saxena
article en

Abstract

The Translational Science Benefits Model (TSBM) was developed to conceptualize and communicate the benefits and impact of translational research. While the TSBM was developed as a conceptual model rather than an operational process, it can be integrated into operational processes to provide evidence and clearly explain the impact of translational research and translational science. This paper discusses the use of the TSBM not only as a conceptual framework but also as a program-integrated operational mechanism. First, it discusses three TSBM-informed programmatic processes for addressing intended and achieved impact: case studies, Pilots program reporting, and an organizational database. Then, it outlines the key factors emerging from these processes that should be considered before employing TSBM as an integrated structure for collecting information on translational research outcomes. In particular, this paper discusses key <i>who</i> questions with a focus on who codes or reports TSBM data, including accounting for the coder or reporter's understanding of the TSBM, while balancing feasibility with validity. Key <i>how</i> questions including a specific focus on how potential TSBM outcomes are defined and determined. Key <i>when</i> questions address potential limitations or adaptation needs in TSBM-based measurement based on specific areas of focus, particularly workforce development and translational science-specific outcomes. Ultimately, this paper provides key lessons to consider when using the TSBM as a data collection tool and also explores opportunities to expand the utility of the TSBM as a data collection tool to understand, demonstrate, and augment the impact of translational research and science.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 13
Social Science Research Council (US), Duke University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Taking the Translational Science Benefits Model from concept to operationalization: opportunities and challenges in defining impact using the Translational Science Benefits Model — Jessica B. Sperling, Stella Quenstedt, et al. · Frontiers in Public Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS