Reliability of PCR Testing Versus Culture Testing in Tuberculosis Diagnosis: A Six-Year Retrospective Study

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global health challenge, particularly in regions with high migration rates like Şanlıurfa, Türkiye. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is essential to improve treat-ment outcomes and reduce transmission. This study evaluated the reliability of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing compared to culture testing, the gold standard, in pulmonary TB diagnosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the records of 1,231 patients diag-nosed with pulmonary TB at the Şanlıurfa Tuberculosis Dispensary between January 2018 and June 2022. Patient demographics, clinical findings, and diagnostic test results were collected. Sensitivity and specificity of PCR and acid-fast bacilli (ARB) smear tests were calculated using culture results as the reference standard. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: The majority of patients were male (60.3%) and over 18 years old (94.5%). PCR showed a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 88%, while ARB had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 99%. PCR and culture concordance was statistically significant across ethnic groups (p=0.001). Common clinical findings included pleural effusion (18.14%) and atelectasis (15.02%). Conclusions: PCR demonstrates high sensitivity and acceptable specificity, supporting its use as a rapid diagnostic tool for pulmonary TB, particularly in resource-limited settings. However, culture testing remains indispensable for definitive diagnosis. Keywords: Tuberculosis, PCR Testing, Culture Testing, Diagnostic Reliability

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.1755437
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability of PCR Testing Versus Culture Testing in Tuberculosis Diagnosis: A Six-Year Retrospective Study

Hamdiye Turan
Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

Reliability of PCR Testing Versus Culture Testing in Tuberculosis Diagnosis: A Six-Year Retrospective Study

Hamdiye Turan
article en

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global health challenge, particularly in regions with high migration rates like Şanlıurfa, Türkiye. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is essential to improve treat-ment outcomes and reduce transmission. This study evaluated the reliability of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing compared to culture testing, the gold standard, in pulmonary TB diagnosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the records of 1,231 patients diag-nosed with pulmonary TB at the Şanlıurfa Tuberculosis Dispensary between January 2018 and June 2022. Patient demographics, clinical findings, and diagnostic test results were collected. Sensitivity and specificity of PCR and acid-fast bacilli (ARB) smear tests were calculated using culture results as the reference standard. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: The majority of patients were male (60.3%) and over 18 years old (94.5%). PCR showed a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 88%, while ARB had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 99%. PCR and culture concordance was statistically significant across ethnic groups (p=0.001). Common clinical findings included pleural effusion (18.14%) and atelectasis (15.02%). Conclusions: PCR demonstrates high sensitivity and acceptable specificity, supporting its use as a rapid diagnostic tool for pulmonary TB, particularly in resource-limited settings. However, culture testing remains indispensable for definitive diagnosis. Keywords: Tuberculosis, PCR Testing, Culture Testing, Diagnostic Reliability

Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi DergisiVol. 22(3)
Harran University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.