Effectiveness of Headsprout Early Reading® in Special Educational Needs Schools: A cluster randomised controlled trial

Abstract Children with intellectual disabilities often find acquiring age‐appropriate reading skills difficult. We evaluated the impact of a structured online reading intervention on the reading skills of children aged 5–11 years in special educational needs (SEN) schools in England. A two‐armed cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) compared Headsprout Early Reading® (HER®) with education as usual (EAU). Children completed the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills® measure online before randomisation and 1 year later. Fifty‐five SEN schools (382 children) were randomised to HER® or EAU. Children in HER® schools made no additional progress in reading, on average, compared to children in EAU schools (Hedges' g = −0.01, 95% CI [−0.28, 0.26]). HER® seemed to have a positive impact on oral reading fluency (IRR = 0.77, 95% CI [0.60, 0.98] SE = 0.1), but these data were only available for 55% of children. Intervention compliance was low, with only ten children completing ≥40% of HER®. HER® was not implemented as planned and attrition was relatively high in the intervention group, compared with EAU. It is therefore difficult to draw firm conclusions. We successfully recruited SEN schools and children, suggesting large‐scale RCTs in SEN schools may be feasible; however, challenges must first be overcome to ensure acceptable implementation. ISRCTN 46208295.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.70037
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Headsprout Early Reading® in Special Educational Needs Schools: A cluster randomised controlled trial

Corinna F. Grindle, Richard P. Hastings, Rebecca Morris, L Denne et al.
1 citations
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Reading and Literacy Development
3.44
article

Effectiveness of Headsprout Early Reading® in Special Educational Needs Schools: A cluster randomised controlled trial

Corinna F. Grindle, Richard P. Hastings, Rebecca Morris, L Denne, Paul Andrew Thompson, Claire McDowell, Emily Tyler, Samantha Flynn, J. Carl Hughes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Children with intellectual disabilities often find acquiring age‐appropriate reading skills difficult. We evaluated the impact of a structured online reading intervention on the reading skills of children aged 5–11 years in special educational needs (SEN) schools in England. A two‐armed cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) compared Headsprout Early Reading® (HER®) with education as usual (EAU). Children completed the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills® measure online before randomisation and 1 year later. Fifty‐five SEN schools (382 children) were randomised to HER® or EAU. Children in HER® schools made no additional progress in reading, on average, compared to children in EAU schools (Hedges' g = −0.01, 95% CI [−0.28, 0.26]). HER® seemed to have a positive impact on oral reading fluency (IRR = 0.77, 95% CI [0.60, 0.98] SE = 0.1), but these data were only available for 55% of children. Intervention compliance was low, with only ten children completing ≥40% of HER®. HER® was not implemented as planned and attrition was relatively high in the intervention group, compared with EAU. It is therefore difficult to draw firm conclusions. We successfully recruited SEN schools and children, suggesting large‐scale RCTs in SEN schools may be feasible; however, challenges must first be overcome to ensure acceptable implementation. ISRCTN 46208295.

Journal of Research in Special Educational NeedsVol. 25(4)
University of Ulster (GB), Bangor University (GB), Wrexham University (GB), Wrexham Maelor Hospital (GB), University of Warwick (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Reading and Literacy Development
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.