China’s AI Development Trajectory: From Fragmented Authoritarianism to Securitisation

China’s 2017 New Generation AI Development Plan marked artificial intelligence as a strategic priority, sparking global competition—particularly with the United States. While Western responses emphasized containment and acceleration, China’s internal dynamics reveal tensions between central coordination and local autonomy. The fragmented authoritarianism thesis, once dominant, is increasingly challenged by the Party’s securitisation of strategic technologies. As Beijing asserts vertical control over AI development, local governments and private firms face pressure to align with national security goals. This hybrid governance model complicates assumptions about China’s AI trajectory and underscores the risks of escalating techno-nationalist competition between major powers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of East Asia Security
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.144339
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China’s AI Development Trajectory: From Fragmented Authoritarianism to Securitisation

Adam C. Bartley
Journal of East Asia Security
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

China’s AI Development Trajectory: From Fragmented Authoritarianism to Securitisation

Adam C. Bartley
article en

Abstract

China’s 2017 New Generation AI Development Plan marked artificial intelligence as a strategic priority, sparking global competition—particularly with the United States. While Western responses emphasized containment and acceleration, China’s internal dynamics reveal tensions between central coordination and local autonomy. The fragmented authoritarianism thesis, once dominant, is increasingly challenged by the Party’s securitisation of strategic technologies. As Beijing asserts vertical control over AI development, local governments and private firms face pressure to align with national security goals. This hybrid governance model complicates assumptions about China’s AI trajectory and underscores the risks of escalating techno-nationalist competition between major powers.

Journal of East Asia SecurityVol. 1(3)
MIT University (MK), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.