Comparison Of Arterial and Venous Blood Gas Values Among Critically Ill Patients

Background and objectives: Arterial blood gas analysis evaluates metabolic and ventilation conditions. Nevertheless, the procedure is characterized by intense discomfort and technical intricacy. In contrast, central venous sampling is a safer and more readily available option for patients with a central line. This research evaluates the agreement between central venous and arterial blood gas measurements in critically ill patients. Methods: In this single-center cross-sectional study, data was collected from May to August of 2023 in the intensive care unit of Shar Hospital in Sulaymaniyah City, Iraq. One hundred pairs of arterial and central venous blood gases were obtained from 100 adult patients. All were mechanically ventilated; the mean age was 54, and 60% of patients were male. For each pair of arterial and central venous samples, pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide standard bicarbonate, extracellular base excess, lactate, and ionized calcium were recorded using a single point-of-care blood gas analyzer. Results: Using the Bland–Altman method, arterial and central venous blood gas values showed high levels of agreement, with mean arteriovenous differences of pH 0.036 ± 0.033, partial pressure of carbon dioxide −4.10 ± 3.581, bicarbonate 0.46 ± 1.542, base excess −0.38 ± 2.625, Lactate −0.172 ± 0.624, and ionized calcium −0.022 ± 0.224. Conclusions: The pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, standard bicarbonate, extracellular base excess, lactate, and ionized calcium levels in central venous blood can be used instead of arterial blood gas measures in the intensive care unit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced medical journal
Published
2025-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56056/amj.2025.362
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Of Arterial and Venous Blood Gas Values Among Critically Ill Patients

Hatem Ali, B. Qadir
Advanced medical journal
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Comparison Of Arterial and Venous Blood Gas Values Among Critically Ill Patients

Hatem Ali, B. Qadir
article en

Abstract

Background and objectives: Arterial blood gas analysis evaluates metabolic and ventilation conditions. Nevertheless, the procedure is characterized by intense discomfort and technical intricacy. In contrast, central venous sampling is a safer and more readily available option for patients with a central line. This research evaluates the agreement between central venous and arterial blood gas measurements in critically ill patients. Methods: In this single-center cross-sectional study, data was collected from May to August of 2023 in the intensive care unit of Shar Hospital in Sulaymaniyah City, Iraq. One hundred pairs of arterial and central venous blood gases were obtained from 100 adult patients. All were mechanically ventilated; the mean age was 54, and 60% of patients were male. For each pair of arterial and central venous samples, pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide standard bicarbonate, extracellular base excess, lactate, and ionized calcium were recorded using a single point-of-care blood gas analyzer. Results: Using the Bland–Altman method, arterial and central venous blood gas values showed high levels of agreement, with mean arteriovenous differences of pH 0.036 ± 0.033, partial pressure of carbon dioxide −4.10 ± 3.581, bicarbonate 0.46 ± 1.542, base excess −0.38 ± 2.625, Lactate −0.172 ± 0.624, and ionized calcium −0.022 ± 0.224. Conclusions: The pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, standard bicarbonate, extracellular base excess, lactate, and ionized calcium levels in central venous blood can be used instead of arterial blood gas measures in the intensive care unit.

Advanced medical journalVol. 10(3)
Swedish Board of Agriculture (SE), Kurdistan Regional Government (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.