Rethinking ethical reflexivity and oversight in health research through an ecosystem approach: A workshop report

As the scope of morally relevant considerations widens and new challenges emerge at the frontiers of health innovation, there are questions about the appropriate role and remit for research ethics review, within the broader context of the whole health research ecosystem. Drawing on discussion at a satellite meeting at the 2022 Global Forum on Bioethics in Research in Cape Town, we argue that the ethical conduct of research is the responsibility of all stakeholders in the research ecosystem – from funders, governments and research institutions to individual research teams and ethics committees. As a research community we need to espouse, and take action to achieve, more distributed approaches to ethical scrutiny and reflexivity. A crucial element of such a shift should be the development of collaborative and non-adversarial relationships between researchers and ethics committees that recognise and respect the mutual responsibilities of all parties to promote ethical research conduct. In tandem with the development of systems to support the exercise of ethical responsibilities across the research ecosystem, committees need to reconceptualise their role, in partnership with communities, as one of providing accountability through a focus on how research promotes participant agency and the common good.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Ethics
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161251346253
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking ethical reflexivity and oversight in health research through an ecosystem approach: A workshop report

Katharine Wright, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Paul Ndebele, Anna Chiumento et al.
Research Ethics
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Rethinking ethical reflexivity and oversight in health research through an ecosystem approach: A workshop report

Katharine Wright, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Paul Ndebele, Anna Chiumento, Florencia Luna, Jantina de Vries, Sharon Kaur, Carleigh Krubiner, Joseph Ali, Agata Ferretti, Ana Palmero, Effy Vayena, Katherine Littler, Teck Chuan Voo, Rachel L Knowles, James Shaw, Adrienne Hunt, Caesar Atuire
article en

Abstract

As the scope of morally relevant considerations widens and new challenges emerge at the frontiers of health innovation, there are questions about the appropriate role and remit for research ethics review, within the broader context of the whole health research ecosystem. Drawing on discussion at a satellite meeting at the 2022 Global Forum on Bioethics in Research in Cape Town, we argue that the ethical conduct of research is the responsibility of all stakeholders in the research ecosystem – from funders, governments and research institutions to individual research teams and ethics committees. As a research community we need to espouse, and take action to achieve, more distributed approaches to ethical scrutiny and reflexivity. A crucial element of such a shift should be the development of collaborative and non-adversarial relationships between researchers and ethics committees that recognise and respect the mutual responsibilities of all parties to promote ethical research conduct. In tandem with the development of systems to support the exercise of ethical responsibilities across the research ecosystem, committees need to reconceptualise their role, in partnership with communities, as one of providing accountability through a focus on how research promotes participant agency and the common good.

Research EthicsVol. 22(1)
University of Ghana (GH), Johns Hopkins University (US), SingHealth (SG), University of Cape Town (ZA), University of Toronto (CA), George Washington University (US), Mahidol University (TH), University of Malaya (MY), ETH Zurich (CH), University of Oxford (GB), UK Research and Innovation (GB), Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics (US), Centro Científico Tecnológico - San Juan (AR), Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Sede Argentina (AR), World Health Organization (CH), Science Council (GB), Wellcome Trust (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, South African Medical Research Council, National Institutes of Health, Medical Research Council, Fogarty International Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.