(Dis)assembling authoritarianism in everyday digitally mediated neighboring

In this commentary, we argue that neighboring, an inevitable form of collectivity rooted in spatial proximity, and its digital environment constitute a crucial arena for both enacting and contesting authoritarianism. Drawing on the assemblage framework, we examine everyday digitally mediated interactions among neighbors in large Russian cities to demonstrate how authoritarianism emerges not solely from above but through the interplay of people, infrastructures, and technologies. We conceptualize authoritarianism as an assemblage that enacts the state as a central actor, attributes problem-solving capacity to it, legitimizes its role in control and discipline, and authorizes it to include or exclude individuals from local life. This enactment occurs through repeated discussions and actions on citizen-led neighborhood digital platforms, which serve as key points where authoritarianism can be situationally “switched on” or “off.” Our analysis highlights how urban citizens participate in reproducing or challenging authoritarianism in the course of everyday life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on Digital Society
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640251377166
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(Dis)assembling authoritarianism in everyday digitally mediated neighboring

Оксана Запорожец, Liubov Chernysheva
Dialogues on Digital Society
Social Media and Politics
article

(Dis)assembling authoritarianism in everyday digitally mediated neighboring

Оксана Запорожец, Liubov Chernysheva
article en

Abstract

In this commentary, we argue that neighboring, an inevitable form of collectivity rooted in spatial proximity, and its digital environment constitute a crucial arena for both enacting and contesting authoritarianism. Drawing on the assemblage framework, we examine everyday digitally mediated interactions among neighbors in large Russian cities to demonstrate how authoritarianism emerges not solely from above but through the interplay of people, infrastructures, and technologies. We conceptualize authoritarianism as an assemblage that enacts the state as a central actor, attributes problem-solving capacity to it, legitimizes its role in control and discipline, and authorizes it to include or exclude individuals from local life. This enactment occurs through repeated discussions and actions on citizen-led neighborhood digital platforms, which serve as key points where authoritarianism can be situationally “switched on” or “off.” Our analysis highlights how urban citizens participate in reproducing or challenging authoritarianism in the course of everyday life.

Dialogues on Digital SocietyVol. 1(3)
Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography (DE), Bauhaus-Universität Weimar (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.