Groundwater vulnerability mapping in the Maze Zenti catchment, Ethiopia: Integrating the DRASTIC model with an entropy-weighted modification in a GIS environment

Groundwater vulnerability mapping is a vital tool for sustainable water resource management, especially in regions where agriculture is the primary means of livelihood. In such areas, groundwater is highly susceptible to contamination due to the slow natural attenuation of pollutants and the limited feasibility of artificial remediation. This study aims to assess the spatial vulnerability of groundwater to contamination in the Maze–Zenti catchment of the Omo Basin, Southern Ethiopia. To achieve this, the study utilized four overlay index models: DRASTIC, Modified DRASTIC, Entropy-DRASTIC, and Entropy-Modified DRASTIC. The study integrated the Shannon Entropy technique to optimize parameter weighting and improve the accuracy of vulnerability mapping. It used observed nitrate concentrations to validate groundwater vulnerability to pollution. The results revealed that the DRASTIC and modified DRASTIC models classified the study area into five vulnerability zones: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. In contrast, the entropy-weighted models grouped the area into four classes: very low, low, moderate, and high groundwater vulnerability to pollution. The DRASTIC and Modified DRASTIC models indicate that a significant portion of the area, 1868.23 km 2 (79.85 %) and 1743.58 (74.52 %), respectively, falls within very low to moderate groundwater pollution vulnerability zones. According to the DRASTIC and modified DRASTIC models, only a small fraction of the area is classified under high to very high pollution vulnerability, covering 471.77 km 2 (20.15 %) and 596.42 km 2 (25.48 %). The Entropy-modified DRASTIC model classified 78.58 % (1838.74 km²) of the area as having very low to moderate vulnerability, while categorizing 21.42 % (501.34 km²) as highly vulnerable. Validation using nitrate (NO₃⁻) concentrations confirmed a strong correlation with the Entropy-modified DRASTIC model, indicating its greater predictive capability of groundwater vulnerability to pollution. Furthermore, the integration of land use/land cover (LULC) data significantly improved model performance by refining the delineation of vulnerable zones. The Entropy-modified DRASTIC model demonstrates higher accuracy and reliability for groundwater vulnerability assessment. Its application can support informed decision-making for sustainable groundwater protection and land use planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific African
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02983
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Groundwater vulnerability mapping in the Maze Zenti catchment, Ethiopia: Integrating the DRASTIC model with an entropy-weighted modification in a GIS environment

Muralitharan Jothimani, Samuel Dagalo Hatiye, Yonas Oyda
1 citations
Scientific African
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
0.80
article

Groundwater vulnerability mapping in the Maze Zenti catchment, Ethiopia: Integrating the DRASTIC model with an entropy-weighted modification in a GIS environment

Muralitharan Jothimani, Samuel Dagalo Hatiye, Yonas Oyda
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Groundwater vulnerability mapping is a vital tool for sustainable water resource management, especially in regions where agriculture is the primary means of livelihood. In such areas, groundwater is highly susceptible to contamination due to the slow natural attenuation of pollutants and the limited feasibility of artificial remediation. This study aims to assess the spatial vulnerability of groundwater to contamination in the Maze–Zenti catchment of the Omo Basin, Southern Ethiopia. To achieve this, the study utilized four overlay index models: DRASTIC, Modified DRASTIC, Entropy-DRASTIC, and Entropy-Modified DRASTIC. The study integrated the Shannon Entropy technique to optimize parameter weighting and improve the accuracy of vulnerability mapping. It used observed nitrate concentrations to validate groundwater vulnerability to pollution. The results revealed that the DRASTIC and modified DRASTIC models classified the study area into five vulnerability zones: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. In contrast, the entropy-weighted models grouped the area into four classes: very low, low, moderate, and high groundwater vulnerability to pollution. The DRASTIC and Modified DRASTIC models indicate that a significant portion of the area, 1868.23 km 2 (79.85 %) and 1743.58 (74.52 %), respectively, falls within very low to moderate groundwater pollution vulnerability zones. According to the DRASTIC and modified DRASTIC models, only a small fraction of the area is classified under high to very high pollution vulnerability, covering 471.77 km 2 (20.15 %) and 596.42 km 2 (25.48 %). The Entropy-modified DRASTIC model classified 78.58 % (1838.74 km²) of the area as having very low to moderate vulnerability, while categorizing 21.42 % (501.34 km²) as highly vulnerable. Validation using nitrate (NO₃⁻) concentrations confirmed a strong correlation with the Entropy-modified DRASTIC model, indicating its greater predictive capability of groundwater vulnerability to pollution. Furthermore, the integration of land use/land cover (LULC) data significantly improved model performance by refining the delineation of vulnerable zones. The Entropy-modified DRASTIC model demonstrates higher accuracy and reliability for groundwater vulnerability assessment. Its application can support informed decision-making for sustainable groundwater protection and land use planning.

Scientific AfricanVol. 30
Arba Minch University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.