Optimization of the Thermal Performance of Na2HPO4·12H2O-Based Gel Phase Change Materials in Solar Greenhouses Using Machine Learning

In the design of gel phase change composite wall materials for solar greenhouses, the alteration of material composition could directly affect the thermal performance of gel phase change composite wall materials. In order to obtain better suitable gel phasechange composite wall material for solar greenhouses, Na<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>·12H<sub>2</sub>O-based gel phasechange materials with different content of ingredient (Na<sub>2</sub>SiO<sub>3</sub>·9H<sub>2</sub>O, C<sub>35</sub>H<sub>49</sub>O<sub>29</sub>, KCl, and nano-α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) were obtained via the Taguchi method and machine learning algorithms, such as Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting Trees (GBDT). The result shows that the GBDT is more suitable for the thermal performance optimization prediction of gel phase change composite wall materials, including time cooling (TC), latent heat of phase change (ΔH<sub>m</sub>), supercooling degree (ΔT), and phase change temperature (T<sub>m</sub>). The determination coefficient (R<sup>2</sup>) of time cooling (TC), latent heat of phase change (ΔH<sub>m</sub>), supercooling degree (ΔT), and phase change temperature (T<sub>m</sub>) by GBDT are 0.9987, 0.99965, 1, and 0.9995, respectively. The mean absolute error (MAE) coefficient percentage of supercooling degree (ΔT), phase change temperature (T<sub>m</sub>), latent heat of phase change (ΔH<sub>m</sub>), and time of cooling (TC) by GBDT are 0.32%, 0.25%, 0.17%, and 0.26%, respectively. The root mean square error (RMSE) of supercooling degree (ΔT), phase change temperature (T<sub>m</sub>), latent heat of phase change (ΔH<sub>m</sub>), and time of cooling (TC) by GBDT are 0.41%, 0.32%, 0.19%, and 0.35%, respectively. The optimal result predicted by GBDT is Na<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>·12H<sub>2</sub>O + 5% Na<sub>2</sub>SiO<sub>3</sub>·9H<sub>2</sub>O + 12% KCl + 0.2% Nano-α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + 3% C<sub>35</sub>H<sub>49</sub>O<sub>29</sub>, which was verified by experiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gels
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11090744
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of the Thermal Performance of Na2HPO4·12H2O-Based Gel Phase Change Materials in Solar Greenhouses Using Machine Learning

Mingze Yao, Wenhe Liu, Mengmeng Yang, Zhanyang Xu et al.
1 citations
Gels
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
0.36
article

Optimization of the Thermal Performance of Na2HPO4·12H2O-Based Gel Phase Change Materials in Solar Greenhouses Using Machine Learning

Mingze Yao, Wenhe Liu, Mengmeng Yang, Zhanyang Xu, Yuhan Huang, Feng Zhang, Yikui Bai, Xuhui Wu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the design of gel phase change composite wall materials for solar greenhouses, the alteration of material composition could directly affect the thermal performance of gel phase change composite wall materials. In order to obtain better suitable gel phasechange composite wall material for solar greenhouses, Na<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>·12H<sub>2</sub>O-based gel phasechange materials with different content of ingredient (Na<sub>2</sub>SiO<sub>3</sub>·9H<sub>2</sub>O, C<sub>35</sub>H<sub>49</sub>O<sub>29</sub>, KCl, and nano-α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) were obtained via the Taguchi method and machine learning algorithms, such as Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting Trees (GBDT). The result shows that the GBDT is more suitable for the thermal performance optimization prediction of gel phase change composite wall materials, including time cooling (TC), latent heat of phase change (ΔH<sub>m</sub>), supercooling degree (ΔT), and phase change temperature (T<sub>m</sub>). The determination coefficient (R<sup>2</sup>) of time cooling (TC), latent heat of phase change (ΔH<sub>m</sub>), supercooling degree (ΔT), and phase change temperature (T<sub>m</sub>) by GBDT are 0.9987, 0.99965, 1, and 0.9995, respectively. The mean absolute error (MAE) coefficient percentage of supercooling degree (ΔT), phase change temperature (T<sub>m</sub>), latent heat of phase change (ΔH<sub>m</sub>), and time of cooling (TC) by GBDT are 0.32%, 0.25%, 0.17%, and 0.26%, respectively. The root mean square error (RMSE) of supercooling degree (ΔT), phase change temperature (T<sub>m</sub>), latent heat of phase change (ΔH<sub>m</sub>), and time of cooling (TC) by GBDT are 0.41%, 0.32%, 0.19%, and 0.35%, respectively. The optimal result predicted by GBDT is Na<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>·12H<sub>2</sub>O + 5% Na<sub>2</sub>SiO<sub>3</sub>·9H<sub>2</sub>O + 12% KCl + 0.2% Nano-α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + 3% C<sub>35</sub>H<sub>49</sub>O<sub>29</sub>, which was verified by experiments.

GelsVol. 11(9)
Dalian Ocean University (CN), Shenyang Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.