Evaluating Dense Model-based Approaches for Multimodal Medical Case Retrieval

Medical case retrieval plays a crucial role in clinical decision-making by enabling healthcare professionals to find relevant cases based on patient records, diagnostic images, and textual descriptions. Given the inherently multimodal nature of medical data, effective retrieval requires models that can bridge the gap between different modalities. Traditional retrieval approaches often rely on unimodal representations, limiting their ability to capture cross-modal relationships. Recent advances in dense model-based techniques have shown promise in overcoming these limitations by encoding multimodal information into a shared latent space, facilitating retrieval based on semantic similarity. This paper investigates the potential of dense models to enhance multimodal search systems. We evaluate various dense model-based approaches to assess which model characteristics have the greatest impact on retrieval effectiveness, using the medical case-based retrieval task from ImageCLEFmed 2013 as a benchmark. Our findings indicate that different dense model approaches substantially impact retrieval effectiveness, and that applying the CombMAX fusion methodto combine their output results further improves effectiveness. Extending context length, however, yielded mixed results depending on the input data. Additionally, domain-specific models—those trained on medical data—outperformed general models trained on broad, non-specialized datasets within their respective fields. Furthermore, when text is the dominant information source, text-only models surpassed multimodal models

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Retrieval Research
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54195/irrj.19769
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Dense Model-based Approaches for Multimodal Medical Case Retrieval

C. H. de P. Pires, Sérgio Nunes, Luís F. Teixeira
Information Retrieval Research
Topic Modeling
article

Evaluating Dense Model-based Approaches for Multimodal Medical Case Retrieval

C. H. de P. Pires, Sérgio Nunes, Luís F. Teixeira
article en

Abstract

Medical case retrieval plays a crucial role in clinical decision-making by enabling healthcare professionals to find relevant cases based on patient records, diagnostic images, and textual descriptions. Given the inherently multimodal nature of medical data, effective retrieval requires models that can bridge the gap between different modalities. Traditional retrieval approaches often rely on unimodal representations, limiting their ability to capture cross-modal relationships. Recent advances in dense model-based techniques have shown promise in overcoming these limitations by encoding multimodal information into a shared latent space, facilitating retrieval based on semantic similarity. This paper investigates the potential of dense models to enhance multimodal search systems. We evaluate various dense model-based approaches to assess which model characteristics have the greatest impact on retrieval effectiveness, using the medical case-based retrieval task from ImageCLEFmed 2013 as a benchmark. Our findings indicate that different dense model approaches substantially impact retrieval effectiveness, and that applying the CombMAX fusion methodto combine their output results further improves effectiveness. Extending context length, however, yielded mixed results depending on the input data. Additionally, domain-specific models—those trained on medical data—outperformed general models trained on broad, non-specialized datasets within their respective fields. Furthermore, when text is the dominant information source, text-only models surpassed multimodal models

Information Retrieval ResearchVol. 1(2)
Universidade do Porto (PT), INESC TEC (PT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.