Evaluating Bagging as a Non-Chemical Screening Method to Manage Grasshoppers in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)

This study evaluated the effectiveness of bagging as a physical exclusion technique for managing grasshopper infestation in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp), in comparison with chemical and botanical treatments. Five management strategies were assessed: chemical control (Malathion 50 EC), traditional practices, azadirachtin application, physical bagging, and an untreated control. Percent damage was recorded at 2, 5, 7, 10, and 14 days after transplanting (DAT). Among all treatments, the physical bagging method consistently maintained zero damage throughout the 14-day observation period, demonstrating significantly superior efficacy. Chemical and traditional methods showed moderate initial effectiveness but declined over time, while azadirachtin was the least effective. These findings highlight bagging as a promising, eco-friendly alternative to chemical control, particularly suited for smallholder farmers seeking sustainable and affordable pest management solutions. Key words Bagging, grass hopper, cowpea, management

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Insect Environment
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55278/noap2215
Primary Topic
Agricultural pest management studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Bagging as a Non-Chemical Screening Method to Manage Grasshoppers in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)

P. K., Manuel Alex
Insect Environment
Agricultural pest management studies
article

Evaluating Bagging as a Non-Chemical Screening Method to Manage Grasshoppers in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)

P. K., Manuel Alex
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of bagging as a physical exclusion technique for managing grasshopper infestation in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp), in comparison with chemical and botanical treatments. Five management strategies were assessed: chemical control (Malathion 50 EC), traditional practices, azadirachtin application, physical bagging, and an untreated control. Percent damage was recorded at 2, 5, 7, 10, and 14 days after transplanting (DAT). Among all treatments, the physical bagging method consistently maintained zero damage throughout the 14-day observation period, demonstrating significantly superior efficacy. Chemical and traditional methods showed moderate initial effectiveness but declined over time, while azadirachtin was the least effective. These findings highlight bagging as a promising, eco-friendly alternative to chemical control, particularly suited for smallholder farmers seeking sustainable and affordable pest management solutions. Key words Bagging, grass hopper, cowpea, management

Insect EnvironmentVol. 28(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Agricultural pest management studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.