Automated brain extraction for canine magnetic resonance images

Brain extraction is a common preprocessing step when working with intracranial medical imaging data. While several tools exist to automate the preprocessing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the human brain, none are available for canine MRIs. We present a pipeline mapping separate 2D scans to a 3D image, and a neural network for canine brain extraction. The training dataset consisted of T1-weighted and contrast-enhanced images from 68 dogs of different breeds, all cranial conformations (mesaticephalic, dolichocephalic, brachycephalic), with several pathological conditions, taken at three institutions. Testing was performed on a similarly diverse group of 10 dogs with images from a 4th institution. The model achieved excellent results in terms of Dice ( $$0.95\pm 0.01$$ ) and Jaccard ( $$0.90\pm 0.01$$ ) metrics and generalised well across different MRI scanners, the three aforementioned skull types, and variations in head size and breed. The pipeline was effective for a combination of one to three acquisition planes (i.e., transversal, dorsal, and sagittal). Aside from the T1 weighted imaging training datasets, the model also performed well on other MRI sequences with Jaccardian indices and median Dice scores ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 and 0.92 to 0.94, respectively. Our approach was robust for automated brain extraction. Variations in canine anatomy and performance degradation in multi-scanner data can largely be mitigated through normalisation and augmentation techniques. Brain extraction, as a preprocessing step, can improve the accuracy of an algorithm for abnormality classification in MRI image slices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Veterinary Research
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-05003-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated brain extraction for canine magnetic resonance images

Jasmin Neßler, Samira Abani, Ehren McLarty, Peter J. Dickinson et al.
1 citations
BMC Veterinary Research
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
0.84
article

Automated brain extraction for canine magnetic resonance images

Jasmin Neßler, Samira Abani, Ehren McLarty, Peter J. Dickinson, Michael Laue, Steven De Decker, Holger A. Volk, Rodrigo Gutierrez‐Quintana, Adriano Wang‐Leandro, Laura Lemke, А. А. Субботин, Thomas M. Deserno, Annika Hänsch, Jörg Janisch, Franziska Spohn, Gloria D. Lesta, Kseniia Bocharova, Stefanie Winzer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Brain extraction is a common preprocessing step when working with intracranial medical imaging data. While several tools exist to automate the preprocessing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the human brain, none are available for canine MRIs. We present a pipeline mapping separate 2D scans to a 3D image, and a neural network for canine brain extraction. The training dataset consisted of T1-weighted and contrast-enhanced images from 68 dogs of different breeds, all cranial conformations (mesaticephalic, dolichocephalic, brachycephalic), with several pathological conditions, taken at three institutions. Testing was performed on a similarly diverse group of 10 dogs with images from a 4th institution. The model achieved excellent results in terms of Dice ( $$0.95\pm 0.01$$ ) and Jaccard ( $$0.90\pm 0.01$$ ) metrics and generalised well across different MRI scanners, the three aforementioned skull types, and variations in head size and breed. The pipeline was effective for a combination of one to three acquisition planes (i.e., transversal, dorsal, and sagittal). Aside from the T1 weighted imaging training datasets, the model also performed well on other MRI sequences with Jaccardian indices and median Dice scores ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 and 0.92 to 0.94, respectively. Our approach was robust for automated brain extraction. Variations in canine anatomy and performance degradation in multi-scanner data can largely be mitigated through normalisation and augmentation techniques. Brain extraction, as a preprocessing step, can improve the accuracy of an algorithm for abnormality classification in MRI image slices.

BMC Veterinary ResearchVol. 21(1)
Royal Veterinary College (GB), University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Fraunhofer Project Centre Wolfsburg (DE), University of Glasgow (GB), University of California, Davis (US), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.