Model based comparison of forest carbon uptake by forest growth and CO2 Release due to forest operations for case studies in Europe and South Africa

When dealing with CO2 in- and outflows of forest ecosystems, the CO2 emissions due to harvest operations have been mostly not included into the analyses, so far. Therefore, to demonstrate an integrative and more holistic view, we used the generic simulation model care4cmodel for assessing relevant silvicultural concepts for pine species in different European (Pinus sylvestris, Pinus pinaster) and South African (Pinus pinaster, Pinus radiata) climatic conditions and management regimes. The concepts covered different thinning and regeneration systems, ranging from clear cut to target diameter harvest. Our focus was on the CO2 emissions due to forest operations (CEF) and their relation to the CO2 uptake due to wood increment (CUI). Simulations covered a time span of 50 years and different scenarios of the initial shares of stand development phases on a large virtual forest area. Our simulations suggest that, across all concepts and countries, the CEF are about 2–3 orders of magnitude smaller than the CUI. More importantly, while the initial situation strongly matters for development of the increment and harvest amounts, it does considerably less so for CEF and CEF/CUI. This provides leeway for silvicultural decisions regarding the above-mentioned CO2 flows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Forest Research
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-025-01821-1
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model based comparison of forest carbon uptake by forest growth and CO2 Release due to forest operations for case studies in Europe and South Africa

Hans Pretzsch, Stefano Grigolato, Ricardo Ruíz‐Peinado, Eric Agestam et al.
European Journal of Forest Research
Forest ecology and management
article

Model based comparison of forest carbon uptake by forest growth and CO2 Release due to forest operations for case studies in Europe and South Africa

Hans Pretzsch, Stefano Grigolato, Ricardo Ruíz‐Peinado, Eric Agestam, Miren del Rı́o, Julia Schmucker, Enno Uhl, Marta Pardos, Kamil Bielak, Ben du Toit, Peter Biber
article en

Abstract

When dealing with CO2 in- and outflows of forest ecosystems, the CO2 emissions due to harvest operations have been mostly not included into the analyses, so far. Therefore, to demonstrate an integrative and more holistic view, we used the generic simulation model care4cmodel for assessing relevant silvicultural concepts for pine species in different European (Pinus sylvestris, Pinus pinaster) and South African (Pinus pinaster, Pinus radiata) climatic conditions and management regimes. The concepts covered different thinning and regeneration systems, ranging from clear cut to target diameter harvest. Our focus was on the CO2 emissions due to forest operations (CEF) and their relation to the CO2 uptake due to wood increment (CUI). Simulations covered a time span of 50 years and different scenarios of the initial shares of stand development phases on a large virtual forest area. Our simulations suggest that, across all concepts and countries, the CEF are about 2–3 orders of magnitude smaller than the CUI. More importantly, while the initial situation strongly matters for development of the increment and harvest amounts, it does considerably less so for CEF and CEF/CUI. This provides leeway for silvicultural decisions regarding the above-mentioned CO2 flows.

European Journal of Forest ResearchVol. 144(6)
Universidad de Valladolid (ES), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), University of Padua (IT), Warsaw University of Life Sciences (PL), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
European Commission, Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Forest ecology and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.