Clinical efficacy of flexible bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage and tNGS analysis for diagnosing active pulmonary tuberculosis

Pulmonary tuberculosis remains a leading infectious disease globally, with traditional diagnostic methods demonstrating significant limitations including poor sensitivity and prolonged diagnostic timeframes, particularly problematic for smear-negative tuberculosis cases. Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) combined with flexible bronchoscopy represents an innovative diagnostic approach that may address these diagnostic challenges through enhanced pathogen detection capabilities. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Guiyang Public Health Treatment Center between January 2021 and December 2023, enrolling 150 patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. Participants were divided into conventional diagnosis group (n=71) receiving standard diagnostic procedures (sputum smear microscopy, GeneXpert MTB/RIF testing, mycobacterial culture) and bronchoscopy-tNGS group (n=79) receiving conventional testing plus flexible bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage for targeted next-generation sequencing analysis. Primary outcome measure was diagnostic yield, with secondary endpoints including diagnostic accuracy, time to diagnosis, clinical outcomes, respiratory parameters, inflammatory biomarkers, and safety profile. The bronchoscopy-tNGS group demonstrated significantly superior diagnostic performance with higher diagnostic yield (84.8% vs 71.8%, p=0.040), improved diagnostic accuracy (87.3% vs 76.1%, p=0.045), enhanced sensitivity (92.0% vs 78.0%, p=0.020), and better specificity (90.0% vs 76.0%, p=0.033) compared to conventional methods. Time efficiency was markedly improved, with reduced time to diagnosis (5.2±1.5 vs 7.4±2.0 days, p<0.001), shorter sampling-to-result intervals (1.4±0.9 vs 3.8±1.5 days, p<0.001), and decreased hospital length of stay (12.3±4.5 vs 15.6±5.0 days, p=0.001). Clinical outcomes favored the bronchoscopy-tNGS approach, including higher treatment initiation rates (89.9% vs 77.5%, p=0.034), better 90-day favorable clinical responses (85.0% vs 68.0%, p=0.017), reduced empirical treatment rates (6.0% vs 22.0%, p=0.005), and improved respiratory function parameters. Safety analysis revealed a superior profile with lower overall adverse event rates (15.0% vs 25.0%, p=0.038) and reduced treatment-related complications. Integration of flexible bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage and targeted next-generation sequencing provides superior diagnostic performance for pulmonary tuberculosis detection compared to conventional methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Problems in Surgery
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpsurg.2025.101895
Primary Topic
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical efficacy of flexible bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage and tNGS analysis for diagnosing active pulmonary tuberculosis

Zhongfeng Huang, Xie Jing, Qiuyue Chen, Ying Gao et al.
Current Problems in Surgery
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
article

Clinical efficacy of flexible bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage and tNGS analysis for diagnosing active pulmonary tuberculosis

Zhongfeng Huang, Xie Jing, Qiuyue Chen, Ying Gao, Silian Chen
article en

Abstract

Pulmonary tuberculosis remains a leading infectious disease globally, with traditional diagnostic methods demonstrating significant limitations including poor sensitivity and prolonged diagnostic timeframes, particularly problematic for smear-negative tuberculosis cases. Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) combined with flexible bronchoscopy represents an innovative diagnostic approach that may address these diagnostic challenges through enhanced pathogen detection capabilities. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Guiyang Public Health Treatment Center between January 2021 and December 2023, enrolling 150 patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. Participants were divided into conventional diagnosis group (n=71) receiving standard diagnostic procedures (sputum smear microscopy, GeneXpert MTB/RIF testing, mycobacterial culture) and bronchoscopy-tNGS group (n=79) receiving conventional testing plus flexible bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage for targeted next-generation sequencing analysis. Primary outcome measure was diagnostic yield, with secondary endpoints including diagnostic accuracy, time to diagnosis, clinical outcomes, respiratory parameters, inflammatory biomarkers, and safety profile. The bronchoscopy-tNGS group demonstrated significantly superior diagnostic performance with higher diagnostic yield (84.8% vs 71.8%, p=0.040), improved diagnostic accuracy (87.3% vs 76.1%, p=0.045), enhanced sensitivity (92.0% vs 78.0%, p=0.020), and better specificity (90.0% vs 76.0%, p=0.033) compared to conventional methods. Time efficiency was markedly improved, with reduced time to diagnosis (5.2±1.5 vs 7.4±2.0 days, p<0.001), shorter sampling-to-result intervals (1.4±0.9 vs 3.8±1.5 days, p<0.001), and decreased hospital length of stay (12.3±4.5 vs 15.6±5.0 days, p=0.001). Clinical outcomes favored the bronchoscopy-tNGS approach, including higher treatment initiation rates (89.9% vs 77.5%, p=0.034), better 90-day favorable clinical responses (85.0% vs 68.0%, p=0.017), reduced empirical treatment rates (6.0% vs 22.0%, p=0.005), and improved respiratory function parameters. Safety analysis revealed a superior profile with lower overall adverse event rates (15.0% vs 25.0%, p=0.038) and reduced treatment-related complications. Integration of flexible bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage and targeted next-generation sequencing provides superior diagnostic performance for pulmonary tuberculosis detection compared to conventional methods.

Current Problems in SurgeryVol. 72
Guiyang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.