Water Temperature Regimes and Thermal Drivers in Semi‐Natural and Flow‐Regulated Rivers of the Northern Great Plains

ABSTRACT Rivers of the northern Great Plains have lacked long‐term, continuous water temperature assessments, and there is limited information on thermal regimes of these systems and factors driving water temperature. We collected and assembled 2001–2022 water temperature data from 18 sites on four reaches of three rivers that differ in anthropogenic impacts: semi‐natural Yellowstone River (YR), flow‐impacted Milk River (MK), 351‐km of the Missouri River affected by hypolimnetic releases from Fort Peck Dam (FPD), and the semi‐natural Missouri River (MR3093) upstream from FPD. Objectives were to: (1) compare May–September mean daily water temperature ( T w ), day of year of maximum water temperature ( T maxdoy ), and maximum water temperature ( T wmax ) among reaches, (2) evaluate air temperature ( T a ), river discharge ( Q w ), and dam‐release water temperature ( T wdam ) as T w drivers, and (3) model longitudinal recovery of T w downstream from FPD. Mean T w and T wmax were greatest at the YR, MR3093 and MK sites, and significantly less through 291‐km downstream from FPD. T maxdoy at initial sites downstream from FPD was delayed 43–69 days relative to the semi‐natural reach upstream from FPD. T a was the primary correlate of T w for the semi‐natural sites; whereas, T wdam and T a varied inversely as primary drivers for sites downstream from FPD. Thermal recovery from hypolimnetic releases was incomplete 291‐km downstream from FPD and warming persisted 351‐km downstream. Results quantify the varied water temperature regimes of rivers in the northern Great Plains and improve understanding of controls affecting T w among reaches. Water temperature attributes of semi‐natural reaches could be used as restoration targets for 300‐km of Missouri River presently impacted by hypolimnetic releases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
River Research and Applications
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.70040
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water Temperature Regimes and Thermal Drivers in Semi‐Natural and Flow‐Regulated Rivers of the Northern Great Plains

Patrick J. Braaten, Thomas Ritter, David B. Fuller, John R. Hunziker et al.
River Research and Applications
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
article

Water Temperature Regimes and Thermal Drivers in Semi‐Natural and Flow‐Regulated Rivers of the Northern Great Plains

Patrick J. Braaten, Thomas Ritter, David B. Fuller, John R. Hunziker, Tyler M. Haddix, John Hargrave
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rivers of the northern Great Plains have lacked long‐term, continuous water temperature assessments, and there is limited information on thermal regimes of these systems and factors driving water temperature. We collected and assembled 2001–2022 water temperature data from 18 sites on four reaches of three rivers that differ in anthropogenic impacts: semi‐natural Yellowstone River (YR), flow‐impacted Milk River (MK), 351‐km of the Missouri River affected by hypolimnetic releases from Fort Peck Dam (FPD), and the semi‐natural Missouri River (MR3093) upstream from FPD. Objectives were to: (1) compare May–September mean daily water temperature ( T w ), day of year of maximum water temperature ( T maxdoy ), and maximum water temperature ( T wmax ) among reaches, (2) evaluate air temperature ( T a ), river discharge ( Q w ), and dam‐release water temperature ( T wdam ) as T w drivers, and (3) model longitudinal recovery of T w downstream from FPD. Mean T w and T wmax were greatest at the YR, MR3093 and MK sites, and significantly less through 291‐km downstream from FPD. T maxdoy at initial sites downstream from FPD was delayed 43–69 days relative to the semi‐natural reach upstream from FPD. T a was the primary correlate of T w for the semi‐natural sites; whereas, T wdam and T a varied inversely as primary drivers for sites downstream from FPD. Thermal recovery from hypolimnetic releases was incomplete 291‐km downstream from FPD and warming persisted 351‐km downstream. Results quantify the varied water temperature regimes of rivers in the northern Great Plains and improve understanding of controls affecting T w among reaches. Water temperature attributes of semi‐natural reaches could be used as restoration targets for 300‐km of Missouri River presently impacted by hypolimnetic releases.

River Research and ApplicationsVol. 41(10)
United States Army Corps of Engineers (US), Fort Peck Community College (US), Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (US)
U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.