Will a Fish's Perspective Improve the Ecological Relevance of River Connectivity Metrics?

ABSTRACT Structural indices of aquatic connectivity typically focus on the spatial arrangement of barriers to fish movement. Here, we describe a method that adapts the widely applied structural Dendritic Connectivity Index (DCI) into a functional index (DCI F ) that constrains connectivity measurements to biologically relevant scales (e.g., based on fish movement behavior). We compare fish communities in five Ontario watersheds to empirically test the hypothesis that they are better explained when connectivity is measured using the DCI F . We test the response of fish abundance grouped by swimming abilities and morphology, along with fish community assemblage as a whole. We expected the DCI F to better explain the abundance of the weakest swimmer groups and overall community assemblage than the structural index. At the spatial scales examined, the DCI F provided modest improvements in explaining the abundance of some fish functional groups. Conversely, we found little to no improvement over the structural index in explaining community structure. Regardless, our paper illustrates a new approach that explicitly incorporates ecologically relevant scales into connectivity measures within watersheds. These scale effects can be significant, and the approach presented here can be applied to aquatic systems at various spatial extents. Our case study suggests that managers may not always need to gather data on fish movement or other biological parameters, and instead can focus on variables that may better explain the effect of barriers on fish community patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
River Research and Applications
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.70028
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Will a Fish's Perspective Improve the Ecological Relevance of River Connectivity Metrics?

Alex Arkilanian, David Côté, Yolanda F. Wiersma, Shad Mahlum et al.
2 citations
River Research and Applications
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
3.43
article

Will a Fish's Perspective Improve the Ecological Relevance of River Connectivity Metrics?

Alex Arkilanian, David Côté, Yolanda F. Wiersma, Shad Mahlum, Dan Kehler, Greig Oldford
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Structural indices of aquatic connectivity typically focus on the spatial arrangement of barriers to fish movement. Here, we describe a method that adapts the widely applied structural Dendritic Connectivity Index (DCI) into a functional index (DCI F ) that constrains connectivity measurements to biologically relevant scales (e.g., based on fish movement behavior). We compare fish communities in five Ontario watersheds to empirically test the hypothesis that they are better explained when connectivity is measured using the DCI F . We test the response of fish abundance grouped by swimming abilities and morphology, along with fish community assemblage as a whole. We expected the DCI F to better explain the abundance of the weakest swimmer groups and overall community assemblage than the structural index. At the spatial scales examined, the DCI F provided modest improvements in explaining the abundance of some fish functional groups. Conversely, we found little to no improvement over the structural index in explaining community structure. Regardless, our paper illustrates a new approach that explicitly incorporates ecologically relevant scales into connectivity measures within watersheds. These scale effects can be significant, and the approach presented here can be applied to aquatic systems at various spatial extents. Our case study suggests that managers may not always need to gather data on fish movement or other biological parameters, and instead can focus on variables that may better explain the effect of barriers on fish community patterns.

River Research and ApplicationsVol. 41(10)
Parks Canada (CA), Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research (CA), National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NZ)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.