Organizational Adaptation Under Goal Multiplicity: Toward an Integration of Dominant Coalition and Problemistic Search Theories

Two of the most influential sub-theories in the behavioral theory of the firm are the theories of the dominant coalition and problemistic search. We argue that the time is ripe for linking these two largely separately developed theories. Organizations increasingly face goal multiplicity as they are compelled to, for example, pursue diverse “social” objectives and engage with a broader array of stakeholders. Simultaneously, increasing environmental dynamism and uncertainty are prompting changes in organizational goals and their salience, and generating ambiguity on goal attainment. New goals as well as changing goals may shake up existing coalitions, requiring the inclusion of new members and renewed bargaining among incumbents. We flesh out these arguments and advance an agenda to advance the proposed integration between theories of the dominant coalition and problemistic search. JEL CLASSIFICATION: D21; D73; D74; D83

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BRQ Business Research Quarterly
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444251377092
Primary Topic
Business Strategy and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organizational Adaptation Under Goal Multiplicity: Toward an Integration of Dominant Coalition and Problemistic Search Theories

Ambra Mazzelli, Nicolai J. Foss
BRQ Business Research Quarterly
Business Strategy and Innovation
article

Organizational Adaptation Under Goal Multiplicity: Toward an Integration of Dominant Coalition and Problemistic Search Theories

Ambra Mazzelli, Nicolai J. Foss
article en

Abstract

Two of the most influential sub-theories in the behavioral theory of the firm are the theories of the dominant coalition and problemistic search. We argue that the time is ripe for linking these two largely separately developed theories. Organizations increasingly face goal multiplicity as they are compelled to, for example, pursue diverse “social” objectives and engage with a broader array of stakeholders. Simultaneously, increasing environmental dynamism and uncertainty are prompting changes in organizational goals and their salience, and generating ambiguity on goal attainment. New goals as well as changing goals may shake up existing coalitions, requiring the inclusion of new members and renewed bargaining among incumbents. We flesh out these arguments and advance an agenda to advance the proposed integration between theories of the dominant coalition and problemistic search. JEL CLASSIFICATION: D21; D73; D74; D83

BRQ Business Research QuarterlyVol. 29
Copenhagen Business School (DK), SKEMA Business School (FR), Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Économie, Gestion (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Business Strategy and Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.