КОМПЛЕКСНА СИСТЕМА ОЦІНЮВАННЯ МЕХАНІЗМІВ ПРИЙНЯТТЯ ЕКСТРЕНИХ УПРАВЛІНСЬКИХ РІШЕНЬ В ГАЛУЗІ ІТ В УМОВАХ НЕВИЗНАЧЕНОСТІ

The article presents a comprehensive analysis of the features of making emergency management decisions in the Ukrainian IT industry under conditions of growing uncertainty caused by martial law and dynamic changes in the technological landscape. Based on a critical analysis of the theoretical work of world-renowned scientists (M. Alle, D. Kahneman, G. Simon) and domestic scholars, it is substantiated that classical models of rational choice are insufficient to describe real-world management practice. It is demonstrated that the effectiveness of crisis decisions directly depends on management's ability to combine flexibility, adaptability, and a solid analytical basis, which necessitates an interdisciplinary approach to the problem. A survey of employees at Ukrainian IT companies identified the key obstacles they face: a lack of information (indicated by 51.0% of respondents), unformulated goals (25.0%), and a psychological barrier in the form of a fear of making mistakes (12.5%). It was found that responsibility for decision-making in the IT sector is primarily placed on the individual (60.4% of respondents), which emphasizes high individual involvement. In comparison, automated systems are almost not used as the primary tool (2.1%). It was found that in war conditions, the most popular technological tools were cloud technologies (16.7%), machine learning and AI (14.6%), and real-time data analysis (12.5%), indicating an orientation towards the stability and continuity of business processes. The general analysis revealed that decision-making occurs in conditions of moderate and high uncertainty, and the primary factors that help maintain composure are prior experience and a precise algorithm of actions. It was concluded that to increase the resilience of the IT sector, it is necessary to implement comprehensive systems that would integrate both technological tools and subjective factors, such as stress resistance and professional experience. The results obtained provide an empirical basis for developing practical training and methodologies that aim to strengthen the economic security of enterprises.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University Economic sciences
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2025-344-4-76
Primary Topic
Technostress in Professional Settings
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

КОМПЛЕКСНА СИСТЕМА ОЦІНЮВАННЯ МЕХАНІЗМІВ ПРИЙНЯТТЯ ЕКСТРЕНИХ УПРАВЛІНСЬКИХ РІШЕНЬ В ГАЛУЗІ ІТ В УМОВАХ НЕВИЗНАЧЕНОСТІ

Igor Shaforenko
Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University Economic sciences
Technostress in Professional Settings
article

КОМПЛЕКСНА СИСТЕМА ОЦІНЮВАННЯ МЕХАНІЗМІВ ПРИЙНЯТТЯ ЕКСТРЕНИХ УПРАВЛІНСЬКИХ РІШЕНЬ В ГАЛУЗІ ІТ В УМОВАХ НЕВИЗНАЧЕНОСТІ

Igor Shaforenko
article en

Abstract

The article presents a comprehensive analysis of the features of making emergency management decisions in the Ukrainian IT industry under conditions of growing uncertainty caused by martial law and dynamic changes in the technological landscape. Based on a critical analysis of the theoretical work of world-renowned scientists (M. Alle, D. Kahneman, G. Simon) and domestic scholars, it is substantiated that classical models of rational choice are insufficient to describe real-world management practice. It is demonstrated that the effectiveness of crisis decisions directly depends on management's ability to combine flexibility, adaptability, and a solid analytical basis, which necessitates an interdisciplinary approach to the problem. A survey of employees at Ukrainian IT companies identified the key obstacles they face: a lack of information (indicated by 51.0% of respondents), unformulated goals (25.0%), and a psychological barrier in the form of a fear of making mistakes (12.5%). It was found that responsibility for decision-making in the IT sector is primarily placed on the individual (60.4% of respondents), which emphasizes high individual involvement. In comparison, automated systems are almost not used as the primary tool (2.1%). It was found that in war conditions, the most popular technological tools were cloud technologies (16.7%), machine learning and AI (14.6%), and real-time data analysis (12.5%), indicating an orientation towards the stability and continuity of business processes. The general analysis revealed that decision-making occurs in conditions of moderate and high uncertainty, and the primary factors that help maintain composure are prior experience and a precise algorithm of actions. It was concluded that to increase the resilience of the IT sector, it is necessary to implement comprehensive systems that would integrate both technological tools and subjective factors, such as stress resistance and professional experience. The results obtained provide an empirical basis for developing practical training and methodologies that aim to strengthen the economic security of enterprises.

Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University Economic sciencesVol. 344(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Technostress in Professional Settings
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

КОМПЛЕКСНА СИСТЕМА ОЦІНЮВАННЯ МЕХАНІЗМІВ ПРИЙНЯТТЯ ЕКСТРЕНИХ УПРАВЛІНСЬКИХ РІШЕНЬ В ГАЛУЗІ ІТ В УМОВАХ НЕВИЗНАЧЕНОСТІ — Igor Shaforenko · Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University Economic sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS