Task-oriented reading in higher education: effects of two types of scripted collaboration

Introduction Task-oriented reading is an important skill in higher education. However, many students in higher education have little experience in this type of reading and lack strategies for executing it efficiently and effectively. The aim of the present study is to design and test a learning environment in realistic classroom settings to foster task-oriented reading in higher education. Methods A learning environment was designed and tested experimentally in a series of lessons to aid teacher students of different disciplines ( N = 105) in the process of task-oriented reading in two stages: homework and group discussion. Using a pre-post experimental design, two types of scripted collaboration were compared: one group received role assignment only, while the other group additionally received instructions about different phases in the collaboration process. Two task-oriented reading tasks (pre- and post-test) were designed, each consisting of four texts and 11 open-ended questions about these texts. Students’ activities during task execution were logged. Results Both groups significantly improved performance between pre- and posttest. However, results showed no significant differences between the two groups in growth between pre- and posttest. Logs of task execution showed that all students spent more time on reading relevant text parts at posttest and spent less time on question reading and answering at posttest, suggesting that students executed task-oriented reading more efficiently as a result of the learning environment. Discussion The results suggest that students exhibited greater efficiency in navigating between their task and text representation, which is in accordance with literature on the process of task-oriented reading. No significant differences were found between the two types of scripting, indicating that the phased discussion did not confer any advantage over role assignment only. This difference may be attributed to the relatively small difference between the two types of scripting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1631174
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Task-oriented reading in higher education: effects of two types of scripted collaboration

Mariska Okkinga, Amos van Gelderen
Frontiers in Education
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Task-oriented reading in higher education: effects of two types of scripted collaboration

Mariska Okkinga, Amos van Gelderen
article en

Abstract

Introduction Task-oriented reading is an important skill in higher education. However, many students in higher education have little experience in this type of reading and lack strategies for executing it efficiently and effectively. The aim of the present study is to design and test a learning environment in realistic classroom settings to foster task-oriented reading in higher education. Methods A learning environment was designed and tested experimentally in a series of lessons to aid teacher students of different disciplines ( N = 105) in the process of task-oriented reading in two stages: homework and group discussion. Using a pre-post experimental design, two types of scripted collaboration were compared: one group received role assignment only, while the other group additionally received instructions about different phases in the collaboration process. Two task-oriented reading tasks (pre- and post-test) were designed, each consisting of four texts and 11 open-ended questions about these texts. Students’ activities during task execution were logged. Results Both groups significantly improved performance between pre- and posttest. However, results showed no significant differences between the two groups in growth between pre- and posttest. Logs of task execution showed that all students spent more time on reading relevant text parts at posttest and spent less time on question reading and answering at posttest, suggesting that students executed task-oriented reading more efficiently as a result of the learning environment. Discussion The results suggest that students exhibited greater efficiency in navigating between their task and text representation, which is in accordance with literature on the process of task-oriented reading. No significant differences were found between the two types of scripting, indicating that the phased discussion did not confer any advantage over role assignment only. This difference may be attributed to the relatively small difference between the two types of scripting.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.