Comprehensive evaluation of critical-size calvarial defect in athymic rat model

The critical size defect (CSD), which defines the threshold beyond which spontaneous healing fails, serves as a foundational tool in bone regeneration research. This study investigated calvarial CSDs in an athymic rat model to refine the definition, emphasize its significance, and address inconsistencies in experimental design across existing information. A 4.5 mm diameter calvarial defect was surgically created in athymic rats. Bone regeneration was assessed using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) at 1, 4, and 8 weeks after the surgery, compared to the baseline (day 0) post-surgery. Histological assessment was performed using a standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining protocol at 8 weeks post-surgery. Quantitative data from micro-CT analysis revealed no increase in bone volume or percentage volume from day 0 to week 1. We observed bone regeneration initiated at week 4 and progressed through week 8, with healing percentages ranging from 0.1% to a maximum of 7%. Histological examination of tissue at week 8 revealed the presence of loose collagen fibers and interspersed fibroblasts, with no mineralization as observed. These findings confirm that the 4.5 mm defect in calvarial bone qualifies as a critical-size defect in the athymic rat model. The study enhances our understanding of bone healing dynamics in CSDs and provides a validated platform for evaluating novel regenerative therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Physiology
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1662424
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive evaluation of critical-size calvarial defect in athymic rat model

Matthew Lewis, Y. Hu, Sehrish Javaid, Toshihisa Kawai et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Physiology
Bone fractures and treatments
2.71
article

Comprehensive evaluation of critical-size calvarial defect in athymic rat model

Matthew Lewis, Y. Hu, Sehrish Javaid, Toshihisa Kawai, Rajendra P. Settem, Umadevi Kandalam, JE Wagner, Todd M. Parco, Carlos A. Acosta, Pratish Parbhoo, Caroline Soviak, John T. Araiza, Colin O'Beirne, Praveen Parachuru
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The critical size defect (CSD), which defines the threshold beyond which spontaneous healing fails, serves as a foundational tool in bone regeneration research. This study investigated calvarial CSDs in an athymic rat model to refine the definition, emphasize its significance, and address inconsistencies in experimental design across existing information. A 4.5 mm diameter calvarial defect was surgically created in athymic rats. Bone regeneration was assessed using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) at 1, 4, and 8 weeks after the surgery, compared to the baseline (day 0) post-surgery. Histological assessment was performed using a standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining protocol at 8 weeks post-surgery. Quantitative data from micro-CT analysis revealed no increase in bone volume or percentage volume from day 0 to week 1. We observed bone regeneration initiated at week 4 and progressed through week 8, with healing percentages ranging from 0.1% to a maximum of 7%. Histological examination of tissue at week 8 revealed the presence of loose collagen fibers and interspersed fibroblasts, with no mineralization as observed. These findings confirm that the 4.5 mm defect in calvarial bone qualifies as a critical-size defect in the athymic rat model. The study enhances our understanding of bone healing dynamics in CSDs and provides a validated platform for evaluating novel regenerative therapies.

Frontiers in PhysiologyVol. 16
Texas Tech University (US), The University of Texas at El Paso (US), Nova Southeastern University (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Bone fractures and treatments
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.