Optimizing Cerebroplacental Ratio Thresholds: Superiority of ≤1.1 Over Less Than 1 for Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

Background The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), calculated as the ratio of middle cerebral artery pulsatility index to umbilical artery pulsatility index, is a non-invasive Doppler marker reflecting placental function and fetal adaptation. While a CPR cut-off <1 has been traditionally used, emerging evidence suggests that ≤1.1 may provide superior predictive accuracy for adverse perinatal outcomes. Objective This study aimed to compare the predictive value of CPR cut-offs <1 and ≤1.1 in identifying term pregnancies at risk of intrapartum complications and adverse neonatal outcomes. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted at Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Kumarhatti, India, over 18 months, including 180 antenatal women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 37-42 weeks. Doppler ultrasonography was performed to assess CPR, and outcomes were analyzed against the two cut-off values. Primary outcomes were intrapartum fetal heart rate abnormalities, mode of delivery, liquor characteristics, birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Results CPR <1 was significantly associated with abnormal fetal heart rate (100% vs. 18.6%; p=0.001), operative deliveries (100% vs. 20.3%; p=0.009), and NICU admissions (100% vs. 19.8%; p=0.001). When the threshold was raised to ≤1.1, predictive strength improved, with abnormal cardiotocography (CTG) (73.5% vs. 7.5%; p=0.001), higher emergency caesarean for fetal distress (100% vs. 84.6%; p=0.043), meconium-stained liquor (41.2% vs. 1.4%; p=0.001), and NICU admission (64.7% vs. 11%; p=0.001) all showing stronger associations. Conclusion CPR ≤1.1 outperforms the conventional cut-off of <1 in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes at term. Incorporating this threshold into routine antenatal surveillance may allow the earlier identification of at-risk fetuses and timely intervention to improve neonatal outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.92417
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Cerebroplacental Ratio Thresholds: Superiority of ≤1.1 Over Less Than 1 for Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

Manisha Behal, Madhusudan Grover, R. K. Singh
Cureus
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Optimizing Cerebroplacental Ratio Thresholds: Superiority of ≤1.1 Over Less Than 1 for Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

Manisha Behal, Madhusudan Grover, R. K. Singh
article en

Abstract

Background The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), calculated as the ratio of middle cerebral artery pulsatility index to umbilical artery pulsatility index, is a non-invasive Doppler marker reflecting placental function and fetal adaptation. While a CPR cut-off <1 has been traditionally used, emerging evidence suggests that ≤1.1 may provide superior predictive accuracy for adverse perinatal outcomes. Objective This study aimed to compare the predictive value of CPR cut-offs <1 and ≤1.1 in identifying term pregnancies at risk of intrapartum complications and adverse neonatal outcomes. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted at Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Kumarhatti, India, over 18 months, including 180 antenatal women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 37-42 weeks. Doppler ultrasonography was performed to assess CPR, and outcomes were analyzed against the two cut-off values. Primary outcomes were intrapartum fetal heart rate abnormalities, mode of delivery, liquor characteristics, birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Results CPR <1 was significantly associated with abnormal fetal heart rate (100% vs. 18.6%; p=0.001), operative deliveries (100% vs. 20.3%; p=0.009), and NICU admissions (100% vs. 19.8%; p=0.001). When the threshold was raised to ≤1.1, predictive strength improved, with abnormal cardiotocography (CTG) (73.5% vs. 7.5%; p=0.001), higher emergency caesarean for fetal distress (100% vs. 84.6%; p=0.043), meconium-stained liquor (41.2% vs. 1.4%; p=0.001), and NICU admission (64.7% vs. 11%; p=0.001) all showing stronger associations. Conclusion CPR ≤1.1 outperforms the conventional cut-off of <1 in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes at term. Incorporating this threshold into routine antenatal surveillance may allow the earlier identification of at-risk fetuses and timely intervention to improve neonatal outcomes.

CureusVol. 17(9)
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.