From Annexation to independence: normative power resurgence and the social construction of Timor-Leste’s statehood

This article explores the interaction between material and normative power in international politics through a comparative analysis of Timor-Leste. By examining Indonesia’s annexation of Timor-Leste in 1975 and its resolution in 1999, this article shows the evolving consideration of normative reasons among actors. In 1975, material power took precedence, freezing the Timor-Leste issue in favour of Indonesia. By 1999, key actors recognized the illegitimacy of the annexation and prioritized a just, internationally acceptable solution for Timor-Leste, aligning with international norms. The article emphasizes the role of normative power in shaping international politics, illustrating that international politics is influenced by both material power and normative legitimacy. It highlights the resilience of normative reasons and the ongoing social (re)construction of international order, challenging the view that international politics is solely driven by material power. While material power may dominate initially, normative power and legitimacy eventually emerge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Research Exchange
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736x.2025.2557319
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Annexation to independence: normative power resurgence and the social construction of Timor-Leste’s statehood

Pedro Emanuel Mendes
Political Research Exchange
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

From Annexation to independence: normative power resurgence and the social construction of Timor-Leste’s statehood

Pedro Emanuel Mendes
article en

Abstract

This article explores the interaction between material and normative power in international politics through a comparative analysis of Timor-Leste. By examining Indonesia’s annexation of Timor-Leste in 1975 and its resolution in 1999, this article shows the evolving consideration of normative reasons among actors. In 1975, material power took precedence, freezing the Timor-Leste issue in favour of Indonesia. By 1999, key actors recognized the illegitimacy of the annexation and prioritized a just, internationally acceptable solution for Timor-Leste, aligning with international norms. The article emphasizes the role of normative power in shaping international politics, illustrating that international politics is influenced by both material power and normative legitimacy. It highlights the resilience of normative reasons and the ongoing social (re)construction of international order, challenging the view that international politics is solely driven by material power. While material power may dominate initially, normative power and legitimacy eventually emerge.

Political Research ExchangeVol. 7(1)
Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.