Barriers to accessing and engaging with mental health services for low-income families in australia: a qualitative evaluation

Child and adolescent mental health disorders are twice as prevalent among families with low socioeconomic status, highlighting that these are the families who most need mental health services. Yet in these families, children and adolescents are less likely to receive mental health care, and even when they do, their outcomes are often poorer than those from families with higher socioeconomic status. The aims of this qualitative study were to identify barriers and facilitators to mental health service access and engagement for children and adolescents from families within the lowest quintile of Australian national household income. Employing a multi-informant focus group methodology, thematic analysis was conducted on four focus groups (total sample, N = 30) consisting of two groups with caregivers, one with adolescents, and one with mental health professionals. Themes included perceptions of service quality, service norms, scepticism and trust, mental health knowledge and communication, and the valued but overwhelmed nature of school-based services. Participants emphasized barriers more than facilitators. Findings suggest that commonly recognised barriers to mental health services may be particularly consequential within socioeconomically disadvantaged contexts, highlighting the urgency to (re)establish models of mental health care that can support the diverse needs of children and families with low socioeconomic status. Children and adolescents from families with low socioeconomic status are less likely to receive mental health services, and even when they do, their outcomes are often poorer than their peers with higher socioeconomic status. There is a vast literature on barriers and facilitators in child and adolescent mental health services for the general population, but information specific to children and adolescents from low socioeconomic backgrounds is lacking. This study identified barriers and facilitators to accessing and engaging with mental health services as perceived by adolescents and caregivers within the lowest quintile of Australian national household income, as well as mental health professionals who serve this population. Findings suggest that commonly recognised barriers to mental health services may be particularly consequential within socioeconomically disadvantaged contexts. There is an urgency to establish models of mental health care that can support the diverse needs of families with low socioeconomic status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Child and Family Studies
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-025-03172-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to accessing and engaging with mental health services for low-income families in australia: a qualitative evaluation

Ronald M. Rapee, Kay Bussey, Sophie J. Dickson, Maria Kangas et al.
2 citations
Journal of Child and Family Studies
Homelessness and Social Issues
5.63
article

Barriers to accessing and engaging with mental health services for low-income families in australia: a qualitative evaluation

Ronald M. Rapee, Kay Bussey, Sophie J. Dickson, Maria Kangas, Sharon Grocott
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Child and adolescent mental health disorders are twice as prevalent among families with low socioeconomic status, highlighting that these are the families who most need mental health services. Yet in these families, children and adolescents are less likely to receive mental health care, and even when they do, their outcomes are often poorer than those from families with higher socioeconomic status. The aims of this qualitative study were to identify barriers and facilitators to mental health service access and engagement for children and adolescents from families within the lowest quintile of Australian national household income. Employing a multi-informant focus group methodology, thematic analysis was conducted on four focus groups (total sample, N = 30) consisting of two groups with caregivers, one with adolescents, and one with mental health professionals. Themes included perceptions of service quality, service norms, scepticism and trust, mental health knowledge and communication, and the valued but overwhelmed nature of school-based services. Participants emphasized barriers more than facilitators. Findings suggest that commonly recognised barriers to mental health services may be particularly consequential within socioeconomically disadvantaged contexts, highlighting the urgency to (re)establish models of mental health care that can support the diverse needs of children and families with low socioeconomic status. Children and adolescents from families with low socioeconomic status are less likely to receive mental health services, and even when they do, their outcomes are often poorer than their peers with higher socioeconomic status. There is a vast literature on barriers and facilitators in child and adolescent mental health services for the general population, but information specific to children and adolescents from low socioeconomic backgrounds is lacking. This study identified barriers and facilitators to accessing and engaging with mental health services as perceived by adolescents and caregivers within the lowest quintile of Australian national household income, as well as mental health professionals who serve this population. Findings suggest that commonly recognised barriers to mental health services may be particularly consequential within socioeconomically disadvantaged contexts. There is an urgency to establish models of mental health care that can support the diverse needs of families with low socioeconomic status.

Journal of Child and Family StudiesVol. 34(11)
Mental Health Australia (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Homelessness and Social Issues
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.