Taxation of Digital Services in a Globalized Economy: Implications for Nigeria and Africa

The pace of digitalization of the world's economy has exposed the flaw of traditional international tax systems, particularly digital services. Multinational technology companies more and more make huge revenues across borders without physical presence, which creates severe challenges for states to exert taxing powers. This paper critically examines taxation of digital services in a global economy, notably Nigeria and Africa. Based on comparative and doctrinal analysis, the study canvasses international tax principles, OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework proposals, United Nations negotiations, and African national tax reforms. Evidence highlights that while unilateral measures such as Digital Services Taxes (DSTs) and Significant Economic Presence (SEP) regulations are lucrative in terms of short-term budgetary gains, they may also carry the risk of administrative inefficiency, double taxation, and potential disagreement in trade. Nigeria's new reforms, including the VAT imposition on non-resident digital providers and SEP actions, are important policy developments that are in the course of implementation but are hampered by the shortcoming of weak administrative capacity and deficit in compliance. Across Africa, similar experiences demonstrate a delicate balance between generating revenue and promoting digital innovation. Tenuously structured levies, such as mobile money, have in some cases jettisoned financial inclusion, demonstrating the risk of unilateral dependence. The report explains that solutions in the long term lie in enhancing domestic enforcement capacity, cooperating more robustly at the regional level through bodies like ECOWAS and the African Union, and engaging more intensively in multilateral tax talks. Lastly, the article argues that a balanced strategy—based on VAT reforms, collection at the platform level, harmonization of regional policy, and positive participation in global arrangements—has the best potential avenue for African countries. These initiatives can bring more equitable revenue sharing, protect digital inclusion, and more seamlessly integrate Africa into the new international tax architecture.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i3-1710538-079
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taxation of Digital Services in a Globalized Economy: Implications for Nigeria and Africa

Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

Taxation of Digital Services in a Globalized Economy: Implications for Nigeria and Africa

article en

Abstract

The pace of digitalization of the world's economy has exposed the flaw of traditional international tax systems, particularly digital services. Multinational technology companies more and more make huge revenues across borders without physical presence, which creates severe challenges for states to exert taxing powers. This paper critically examines taxation of digital services in a global economy, notably Nigeria and Africa. Based on comparative and doctrinal analysis, the study canvasses international tax principles, OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework proposals, United Nations negotiations, and African national tax reforms. Evidence highlights that while unilateral measures such as Digital Services Taxes (DSTs) and Significant Economic Presence (SEP) regulations are lucrative in terms of short-term budgetary gains, they may also carry the risk of administrative inefficiency, double taxation, and potential disagreement in trade. Nigeria's new reforms, including the VAT imposition on non-resident digital providers and SEP actions, are important policy developments that are in the course of implementation but are hampered by the shortcoming of weak administrative capacity and deficit in compliance. Across Africa, similar experiences demonstrate a delicate balance between generating revenue and promoting digital innovation. Tenuously structured levies, such as mobile money, have in some cases jettisoned financial inclusion, demonstrating the risk of unilateral dependence. The report explains that solutions in the long term lie in enhancing domestic enforcement capacity, cooperating more robustly at the regional level through bodies like ECOWAS and the African Union, and engaging more intensively in multilateral tax talks. Lastly, the article argues that a balanced strategy—based on VAT reforms, collection at the platform level, harmonization of regional policy, and positive participation in global arrangements—has the best potential avenue for African countries. These initiatives can bring more equitable revenue sharing, protect digital inclusion, and more seamlessly integrate Africa into the new international tax architecture.

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 9(3)
Lead City University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.