Probability of criminal punishment of physicians in Korea is remarkably higher than in Japan and France

Is the criminal prosecution of physicians in Korea excessive?Recently, a Korean government report-commissioned by the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) and conducted by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs-examined the criminal prosecution of physicians in Korea [1].On average, 38 criminal trials took place annually. Korea's 38 cases: among the highest global rates of criminal trialsThis figure is striking.Even acknowledging the research limitations and the report's scope, the finding that 34 physicians are criminally prosecuted each year for adverse medical outcomes is significant.A straightforward international comparison suggests that, in a country with about 100,000 practicing physicians, 38 prosecutions annually for medical-related incidents places Korea among the highest in the world.For example, although the data are older, one review indicated that the province of Ontario, Canada, recorded only one case in 108 years in which a physician was criminally convicted for a medical incidentan anesthesiologist who self-reported leaving their post, resulting in a medical accident [2].Apart from this case, there are no verifiable instances of criminal prosecution for medical-related incidents in Ontario.Table 1 compares outcomes of first-instance criminal trials for occupational negligence resulting in death or injury among physicians in Korea-based on a complete enumeration by the Korean Medical Association Research Institute for Healthcare Policy (RIHP)-with those in Japan and the United Kingdom.Between 1999 and 2016 (18 years), Japan recorded 202 first-instance criminal judgments against physicians for occupational negligence resulting in death or injury, of which only 32 resulted in convictions-an average of 1.8 per year.Moreover, Japan's scope included the management and supervision of medical assistants as well as the operation of medical equipment, suggesting that the number of cases involving purely medical malpractice is likely smaller.In Commonwealth and Nordic countries-often highlighted as examples of robust public healthcare systems-criminal prosecutions of physicians are so rare that official statistics are almost nonexistent.A fairly recent UK judiciary report recorded only four physician convictions over a 6year period [3,4].Fig. 1 presents the relative average number of criminal trials for occupational negligence resulting in death or injury by physicians, normalized to the United Kingdom as 1.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Ewha Medical Journal
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12771/emj.2025.00738
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probability of criminal punishment of physicians in Korea is remarkably higher than in Japan and France

Hyoung−il Kim, Duck Sun Ahn
3 citations
The Ewha Medical Journal
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
6.07
article

Probability of criminal punishment of physicians in Korea is remarkably higher than in Japan and France

Hyoung−il Kim, Duck Sun Ahn
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Is the criminal prosecution of physicians in Korea excessive?Recently, a Korean government report-commissioned by the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) and conducted by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs-examined the criminal prosecution of physicians in Korea [1].On average, 38 criminal trials took place annually. Korea's 38 cases: among the highest global rates of criminal trialsThis figure is striking.Even acknowledging the research limitations and the report's scope, the finding that 34 physicians are criminally prosecuted each year for adverse medical outcomes is significant.A straightforward international comparison suggests that, in a country with about 100,000 practicing physicians, 38 prosecutions annually for medical-related incidents places Korea among the highest in the world.For example, although the data are older, one review indicated that the province of Ontario, Canada, recorded only one case in 108 years in which a physician was criminally convicted for a medical incidentan anesthesiologist who self-reported leaving their post, resulting in a medical accident [2].Apart from this case, there are no verifiable instances of criminal prosecution for medical-related incidents in Ontario.Table 1 compares outcomes of first-instance criminal trials for occupational negligence resulting in death or injury among physicians in Korea-based on a complete enumeration by the Korean Medical Association Research Institute for Healthcare Policy (RIHP)-with those in Japan and the United Kingdom.Between 1999 and 2016 (18 years), Japan recorded 202 first-instance criminal judgments against physicians for occupational negligence resulting in death or injury, of which only 32 resulted in convictions-an average of 1.8 per year.Moreover, Japan's scope included the management and supervision of medical assistants as well as the operation of medical equipment, suggesting that the number of cases involving purely medical malpractice is likely smaller.In Commonwealth and Nordic countries-often highlighted as examples of robust public healthcare systems-criminal prosecutions of physicians are so rare that official statistics are almost nonexistent.A fairly recent UK judiciary report recorded only four physician convictions over a 6year period [3,4].Fig. 1 presents the relative average number of criminal trials for occupational negligence resulting in death or injury by physicians, normalized to the United Kingdom as 1.

The Ewha Medical JournalVol. 48(4)
Korea University (KR), Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
6.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.