THE STAKES OF PHILOLOGY: REALITIES, ORIGINS, FUTURES

ABSTRACT What does philology mean today? And what can it do in the future? In this article, I respond to these questions by performing—again—a “return to philology,” as Paul de Man proclaimed in the 1980s. To engage with the present and future of philology, I return to nineteenth‐century Germany and to some of the controversies that played out between the main proponents of the new discipline, including Gottfried Hermann, August Boeckh, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Ulrich von Wilamowitz‐Moellendorf. This was the time and place where philology came into its own and some of the discipline's stakes were spelled out for the first time. These stakes were both methodological and theoretical, phenomenological and ontological, and can be discussed according to their three main concerns: the struggle for the real, the possibility of origins, and the futures of the past. Invoking “Philology Now,” I argue, means bringing these stakes back into our discussion about history and theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History and Theory
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70009
Primary Topic
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE STAKES OF PHILOLOGY: REALITIES, ORIGINS, FUTURES

Helge Jordheim
History and Theory
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
article

THE STAKES OF PHILOLOGY: REALITIES, ORIGINS, FUTURES

Helge Jordheim
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT What does philology mean today? And what can it do in the future? In this article, I respond to these questions by performing—again—a “return to philology,” as Paul de Man proclaimed in the 1980s. To engage with the present and future of philology, I return to nineteenth‐century Germany and to some of the controversies that played out between the main proponents of the new discipline, including Gottfried Hermann, August Boeckh, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Ulrich von Wilamowitz‐Moellendorf. This was the time and place where philology came into its own and some of the discipline's stakes were spelled out for the first time. These stakes were both methodological and theoretical, phenomenological and ontological, and can be discussed according to their three main concerns: the struggle for the real, the possibility of origins, and the futures of the past. Invoking “Philology Now,” I argue, means bringing these stakes back into our discussion about history and theory.

History and TheoryVol. 64(4)
University of Oslo (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.