A Comparative Analysis of Competition Policy in Science Commercialisation

Science commercialisation serves as a fundamental process to convert research discoveries into marketable products, which drive economic development and solve social requirements. Science commercialisation maintains a sophisticated relationship with competition policy. This research examines how competition policy creates conditions that support science commercialisation while maintaining fair access to benefits for all. The analysis examines three significant challenges, which include research monopolisation, high barriers to entry for new innovators and ethical concerns about privatising public knowledge. The research evaluates worldwide best practices by studying the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States and the Horizon 2020 programme of the European Union to determine their impact on outcomes. Moreover, the paper addresses the gap by examining how competition policy mechanisms can balance innovation incentives with broad access, using case studies and policy analysis, and this analysis leads to policy recommendations that support innovation-friendly competition.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52340/gs.2025.07.03.34
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Competition Policy in Science Commercialisation

Sergo Sanikidze
GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

A Comparative Analysis of Competition Policy in Science Commercialisation

Sergo Sanikidze
article en

Abstract

Science commercialisation serves as a fundamental process to convert research discoveries into marketable products, which drive economic development and solve social requirements. Science commercialisation maintains a sophisticated relationship with competition policy. This research examines how competition policy creates conditions that support science commercialisation while maintaining fair access to benefits for all. The analysis examines three significant challenges, which include research monopolisation, high barriers to entry for new innovators and ethical concerns about privatising public knowledge. The research evaluates worldwide best practices by studying the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States and the Horizon 2020 programme of the European Union to determine their impact on outcomes. Moreover, the paper addresses the gap by examining how competition policy mechanisms can balance innovation incentives with broad access, using case studies and policy analysis, and this analysis leads to policy recommendations that support innovation-friendly competition.

GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of Competition Policy in Science Commercialisation — Sergo Sanikidze · GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS