Paradigm Transformation of Integrating Design Thinking into Curriculum Teaching - Reconstruction of Teaching Model Based on Cognitive Science

With the continuous improvement of higher education's requirements for students' comprehensive innovation ability, traditional curriculum teaching has problems such as fragmented design process, single evaluation method and insufficient student participation. To this end, this paper introduces the design thinking paradigm and integrates artificial intelligence and Internet of Things technologies to reconstruct the course teaching process from the six stages of "understanding-observation-definition-concept-prototype-testing". Artificial intelligence is used to assist in creative generation, sentiment analysis and user portrait modeling, while the Internet of Things supports real-time collection and feedback tracking of user behavior data during prototype testing, thereby achieving full-process, visual learning evaluation and teaching regulation. Through comparative analysis, the experiment found that the teaching model after integrating technology significantly improved students' performance in key ability dimensions such as creative expression, problem solving, interdisciplinary integration and collaborative communication. The experimental group was slightly better than the control group in most dimensions, especially in ability improvement and collaborative experience, reflecting the positive role of design thinking-oriented teaching in promoting students' emotional investment and cognitive acquisition. First, in terms of course participation, the experimental group scored an average of 4.6 points, while the control group scored 3.55 points. The experimental group had a slightly higher proportion of "high score frequency" (5 points), indicating that its teaching activities were more attractive and participation-driven.

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of New Developments in Education
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25236/ijnde.2025.070724
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paradigm Transformation of Integrating Design Thinking into Curriculum Teaching - Reconstruction of Teaching Model Based on Cognitive Science

International Journal of New Developments in Education
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

Paradigm Transformation of Integrating Design Thinking into Curriculum Teaching - Reconstruction of Teaching Model Based on Cognitive Science

article en

Abstract

With the continuous improvement of higher education's requirements for students' comprehensive innovation ability, traditional curriculum teaching has problems such as fragmented design process, single evaluation method and insufficient student participation. To this end, this paper introduces the design thinking paradigm and integrates artificial intelligence and Internet of Things technologies to reconstruct the course teaching process from the six stages of "understanding-observation-definition-concept-prototype-testing". Artificial intelligence is used to assist in creative generation, sentiment analysis and user portrait modeling, while the Internet of Things supports real-time collection and feedback tracking of user behavior data during prototype testing, thereby achieving full-process, visual learning evaluation and teaching regulation. Through comparative analysis, the experiment found that the teaching model after integrating technology significantly improved students' performance in key ability dimensions such as creative expression, problem solving, interdisciplinary integration and collaborative communication. The experimental group was slightly better than the control group in most dimensions, especially in ability improvement and collaborative experience, reflecting the positive role of design thinking-oriented teaching in promoting students' emotional investment and cognitive acquisition. First, in terms of course participation, the experimental group scored an average of 4.6 points, while the control group scored 3.55 points. The experimental group had a slightly higher proportion of "high score frequency" (5 points), indicating that its teaching activities were more attractive and participation-driven.

International Journal of New Developments in EducationVol. 7(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.