Aerial estimates of methane and carbon dioxide emission rates using a mass balance approach in New York State

Abstract. Accurate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission inventories are vital for climate mitigation as they can identify areas of need and ensure effective policy and regulation in reducing GHG emissions. Several studies have shown that self-reporting GHG inventories are undercounting methane emissions across all anthropogenic sectors, showing an increasing need to validate the inventory with direct measurements. This study carried out aerial observations and emission rates of methane and carbon dioxide across multiple sectors in New York State (NYS). Emission rates were calculated for each of the sources using a mass balance method and were subsequently compared to the 2021 Environmental Protection Agency GHG Reporting Program (EPA GHGRP) Inventory. Landfills were the source of the highest observed methane emission estimates, ranging from 161 to 3440 kg h−1. There was also significant variation in observed emissions within facilities between seasons, indicating a significant influence from meteorology. Variation in estimated measured emissions between different landfills could be due to operational differences. Observed carbon dioxide emission estimates were dominated by combustion facilities, followed by landfills. Comparisons with the inventory show that methane emissions averaged over 10 observed landfills are underestimated by a factor of 2. However, of the 10 landfills, 5 had observed methane emission estimates significantly higher than the inventory value, 4 had an inventory value within the uncertainty range of the observations, and 1 had a landfill-observed emission estimate that was markedly lower than the reported inventory estimate. Seneca Meadows Landfill was the highest emitter from the measurements and was ∼ 4.3× higher than the annual average estimate that was reported to the 2021 EPA GHGRP Inventory. NYS can use this information to inform the NYS GHG Inventory and improve emission estimation methodologies to better depict actual emissions. The two datasets described in this paper are published on PANGAEA. The raw dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.979845 (Catena and Smith, 2025a). The emission rate dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.979843 (Catena and Smith, 2025b).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth system science data
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4555-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aerial estimates of methane and carbon dioxide emission rates using a mass balance approach in New York State

James J. Schwab, Alexandra Catena, Lee Thomas Murray, Eric M. Leibensperger et al.
1 citations
Earth system science data
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
article

Aerial estimates of methane and carbon dioxide emission rates using a mass balance approach in New York State

James J. Schwab, Alexandra Catena, Lee Thomas Murray, Eric M. Leibensperger, M. L. Smith, Margaret J. Schwab
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Accurate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission inventories are vital for climate mitigation as they can identify areas of need and ensure effective policy and regulation in reducing GHG emissions. Several studies have shown that self-reporting GHG inventories are undercounting methane emissions across all anthropogenic sectors, showing an increasing need to validate the inventory with direct measurements. This study carried out aerial observations and emission rates of methane and carbon dioxide across multiple sectors in New York State (NYS). Emission rates were calculated for each of the sources using a mass balance method and were subsequently compared to the 2021 Environmental Protection Agency GHG Reporting Program (EPA GHGRP) Inventory. Landfills were the source of the highest observed methane emission estimates, ranging from 161 to 3440 kg h−1. There was also significant variation in observed emissions within facilities between seasons, indicating a significant influence from meteorology. Variation in estimated measured emissions between different landfills could be due to operational differences. Observed carbon dioxide emission estimates were dominated by combustion facilities, followed by landfills. Comparisons with the inventory show that methane emissions averaged over 10 observed landfills are underestimated by a factor of 2. However, of the 10 landfills, 5 had observed methane emission estimates significantly higher than the inventory value, 4 had an inventory value within the uncertainty range of the observations, and 1 had a landfill-observed emission estimate that was markedly lower than the reported inventory estimate. Seneca Meadows Landfill was the highest emitter from the measurements and was ∼ 4.3× higher than the annual average estimate that was reported to the 2021 EPA GHGRP Inventory. NYS can use this information to inform the NYS GHG Inventory and improve emission estimation methodologies to better depict actual emissions. The two datasets described in this paper are published on PANGAEA. The raw dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.979845 (Catena and Smith, 2025a). The emission rate dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.979843 (Catena and Smith, 2025b).

Earth system science dataVol. 17(9)
Albany State University (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), Scientific Aviation (United States) (US), University of Rochester (US), Ithaca College (US)
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.