Healthcare Pay Systems Affect Quality of Care

Remuneration in health care is a contested topic, with various pay systems rewarding equal services unequally. This study investigates the motives of 17 panel doctors in Austria and identifies dysfunctionalities in remuneration systems that do not guarantee optimal, outcome-oriented treatment. Using Vroom’s expectancy theory of motivation (1964), we analyse the behavioural motivation of doctors, considering both individual and environmental factors. We identify four types of panel doctors – profit maximisers, prestige seekers, altruists and system-compliant types – and explore how remuneration impacts their choices and outcome expectations. Our findings show that doctors’ motivations, shaped by their goals (e.g., quality assurance or leisure time), affect their performance. Regional context factors further inform the design of an outcome-oriented pay system. The study concludes with practical implications for health service providers and highlights future research directions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Compensation & Benefits Review
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08863687251367837
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare Pay Systems Affect Quality of Care

Josef Scheff, Christian Hirt
Compensation & Benefits Review
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Healthcare Pay Systems Affect Quality of Care

Josef Scheff, Christian Hirt
article en

Abstract

Remuneration in health care is a contested topic, with various pay systems rewarding equal services unequally. This study investigates the motives of 17 panel doctors in Austria and identifies dysfunctionalities in remuneration systems that do not guarantee optimal, outcome-oriented treatment. Using Vroom’s expectancy theory of motivation (1964), we analyse the behavioural motivation of doctors, considering both individual and environmental factors. We identify four types of panel doctors – profit maximisers, prestige seekers, altruists and system-compliant types – and explore how remuneration impacts their choices and outcome expectations. Our findings show that doctors’ motivations, shaped by their goals (e.g., quality assurance or leisure time), affect their performance. Regional context factors further inform the design of an outcome-oriented pay system. The study concludes with practical implications for health service providers and highlights future research directions.

Compensation & Benefits ReviewVol. 58(1)
University of Graz (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.