A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy and Corrected Assisted Synchronized Periodic Therapy

Background and purpose: Stroke is a leading cause of permanent disability in worldwide. It occurs when the brain's blood supply is disrupted. This may manifest as an artery blockage or as internal bleeding in the brain. Brain damage from a stroke can result in weakness, paralysis, loss of coordination, spasticity, and a reduction in limb range of motion. Objectives: The study's objective is to evaluate the efficacy of corrected assisted synchronized periodic therapy and constraint-induced movement therapy in treating upper limb stroke. Method: The patient received an explanation of the treatment process. Written consent was obtained in order to participate in this study voluntarily. Using the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thirty patients who had upper limb strokes were selected and divided into two groups, Group A and Group B. In order to treat upper limb stroke, Group B received corrected assisted synchronized periodic therapy, while Group A received constraint-induced movement therapy. The values of pre and post interventions are assessed through Fugl Meyer Assessment scale and Wolf Motor Function test. Result: Group A and Group B participants are included in the study and completed the 15 sessions of constraint induced movement therapy and Corrected assisted synchronized periodic therapy and they were evaluated at three -month follow up. The study's findings demonstrated that both groups had significantly improved. The subject who participated in experimental Group A had shown good improvement on motor ability, reducing spasticity and activities of daily living than the Group B. Conclusion: This study concluded that those who received Constraint Induced Movement Therapy resulted in improvement on motor ability, reducing spasticity and activities of daily living than those who received Corrected Assisted Synchronized Periodic therapy. Key words: Constraint Induced Movement therapy, Corrected Assisted Synchronized Periodic therapy, Wolf Motor Function test, Fugl Meyer Assessment scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Health Sciences and Research
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52403/ijhsr.20250948
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy and Corrected Assisted Synchronized Periodic Therapy

R. Ferdinand, R. Vishnupriya, K. Anantharaj, S. Kohilavani et al.
International Journal of Health Sciences and Research
Children's Physical and Motor Development
article

A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy and Corrected Assisted Synchronized Periodic Therapy

R. Ferdinand, R. Vishnupriya, K. Anantharaj, S. Kohilavani, M. P. Thenmozhi, D. Kannan, Golda, S. Sathyapriy
article en

Abstract

Background and purpose: Stroke is a leading cause of permanent disability in worldwide. It occurs when the brain's blood supply is disrupted. This may manifest as an artery blockage or as internal bleeding in the brain. Brain damage from a stroke can result in weakness, paralysis, loss of coordination, spasticity, and a reduction in limb range of motion. Objectives: The study's objective is to evaluate the efficacy of corrected assisted synchronized periodic therapy and constraint-induced movement therapy in treating upper limb stroke. Method: The patient received an explanation of the treatment process. Written consent was obtained in order to participate in this study voluntarily. Using the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thirty patients who had upper limb strokes were selected and divided into two groups, Group A and Group B. In order to treat upper limb stroke, Group B received corrected assisted synchronized periodic therapy, while Group A received constraint-induced movement therapy. The values of pre and post interventions are assessed through Fugl Meyer Assessment scale and Wolf Motor Function test. Result: Group A and Group B participants are included in the study and completed the 15 sessions of constraint induced movement therapy and Corrected assisted synchronized periodic therapy and they were evaluated at three -month follow up. The study's findings demonstrated that both groups had significantly improved. The subject who participated in experimental Group A had shown good improvement on motor ability, reducing spasticity and activities of daily living than the Group B. Conclusion: This study concluded that those who received Constraint Induced Movement Therapy resulted in improvement on motor ability, reducing spasticity and activities of daily living than those who received Corrected Assisted Synchronized Periodic therapy. Key words: Constraint Induced Movement therapy, Corrected Assisted Synchronized Periodic therapy, Wolf Motor Function test, Fugl Meyer Assessment scale.

International Journal of Health Sciences and ResearchVol. 15(9)
Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University (IN), Medical Research Foundation (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.