Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Severe Prurigo Nodularis in Italy

Prurigo nodularis is characterized by intensely pruritic nodules that significantly impact patients' quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dupilumab compared with the best supportive care for the treatment of severe prurigo nodularis from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. A cost-effectiveness model was developed using a decision tree followed by a Markov approach with a lifetime horizon (30 years). Baseline characteristics, efficacy, and utility data were derived from the pooled analysis of PRIME and PRIME2 trials. Direct healthcare costs based on drug acquisition, adverse event and complications management, and disease-related healthcare resource utilization were considered. Dupilumab improved health outcomes, with an incremental gain of 1.481 quality-adjusted life-years compared with best supportive care. The total cost of dupilumab treatment was €148,964, compared with €70,957 for the best supportive care arm, thus resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €52,661 per quality-adjusted life-year. Scenario analyses indicated that at a discount ≥ 20%, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was lower than €40,000/quality-adjusted life-year. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Dupilumab is likely to be a cost-effective treatment for severe prurigo nodularis patients eligible for systemic therapy in Italy, as it reduces disease burden and healthcare costs associated with uncontrolled prurigo nodularis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Dermato Venereologica
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v105.43590
Primary Topic
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Severe Prurigo Nodularis in Italy

Donia Bahloul, Massimiliano Povero, Maria Paola Pedone, Paolo Amerio et al.
Acta Dermato Venereologica
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
article

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Severe Prurigo Nodularis in Italy

Donia Bahloul, Massimiliano Povero, Maria Paola Pedone, Paolo Amerio, J Tavi, Cataldo Patruno, Andrea Tassone
article en

Abstract

Prurigo nodularis is characterized by intensely pruritic nodules that significantly impact patients' quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dupilumab compared with the best supportive care for the treatment of severe prurigo nodularis from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. A cost-effectiveness model was developed using a decision tree followed by a Markov approach with a lifetime horizon (30 years). Baseline characteristics, efficacy, and utility data were derived from the pooled analysis of PRIME and PRIME2 trials. Direct healthcare costs based on drug acquisition, adverse event and complications management, and disease-related healthcare resource utilization were considered. Dupilumab improved health outcomes, with an incremental gain of 1.481 quality-adjusted life-years compared with best supportive care. The total cost of dupilumab treatment was €148,964, compared with €70,957 for the best supportive care arm, thus resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €52,661 per quality-adjusted life-year. Scenario analyses indicated that at a discount ≥ 20%, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was lower than €40,000/quality-adjusted life-year. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Dupilumab is likely to be a cost-effective treatment for severe prurigo nodularis patients eligible for systemic therapy in Italy, as it reduces disease burden and healthcare costs associated with uncontrolled prurigo nodularis.

Acta Dermato VenereologicaVol. 105
University of Molise (IT), Sanofi (France) (FR), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), Sanofi (Italy) (IT), Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) (GB), Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology (IT)
Amgen, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Les Laboratories Pierre Fabre, Galderma, LEO Pharma
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.