IMPLICIT COMPARISONS: VISUALITY AND THE INTERLINEAR MANUSCRIPT PAGE

ABSTRACT A central question for European philology, informed by various agendas and ideologies, concerned comparison and the positing of hierarchies among languages. With this “traditional” question of philology in mind, but hoping to think in less traditional ways, this article asks how comparative understandings of Arabic and local languages of the Indonesian archipelago may have been reflected in nineteenth‐ and twentieth‐century Islamic manuscripts that contain interlinear translations. These Islamic interlinear translations contain a text written in Arabic with a translation into Javanese or Malay appearing in between the lines of Arabic text. Such translations often follow a word‐for‐word model, striving to replicate the source down to the level of prepositions and word order even when the result is far from idiomatic. Many questions could be asked about the translation of doctrine, values, and stories through these bilingual manuscripts. However, although I have been trained to examine texts for their content and literary dimensions, I will attempt to put these dimensions aside momentarily in favor of considering “sensory translation.” Doing so, I explore what visual aspects (including script size, ink color, and writing angle) might tell us about the “implicit comparisons” between languages as reflected on the page.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History and Theory
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70002
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPLICIT COMPARISONS: VISUALITY AND THE INTERLINEAR MANUSCRIPT PAGE

Ronit Ricci
History and Theory
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

IMPLICIT COMPARISONS: VISUALITY AND THE INTERLINEAR MANUSCRIPT PAGE

Ronit Ricci
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT A central question for European philology, informed by various agendas and ideologies, concerned comparison and the positing of hierarchies among languages. With this “traditional” question of philology in mind, but hoping to think in less traditional ways, this article asks how comparative understandings of Arabic and local languages of the Indonesian archipelago may have been reflected in nineteenth‐ and twentieth‐century Islamic manuscripts that contain interlinear translations. These Islamic interlinear translations contain a text written in Arabic with a translation into Javanese or Malay appearing in between the lines of Arabic text. Such translations often follow a word‐for‐word model, striving to replicate the source down to the level of prepositions and word order even when the result is far from idiomatic. Many questions could be asked about the translation of doctrine, values, and stories through these bilingual manuscripts. However, although I have been trained to examine texts for their content and literary dimensions, I will attempt to put these dimensions aside momentarily in favor of considering “sensory translation.” Doing so, I explore what visual aspects (including script size, ink color, and writing angle) might tell us about the “implicit comparisons” between languages as reflected on the page.

History and TheoryVol. 64(4)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), National Library of Israel (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.