Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and consistency in applying the 2017 periodontal classification among dental professionals

Understanding gum disease correctly is important for providing patients with the right treatments. This study looked at how accurately different groups of dental professionals - specialists in gum disease (periodontists), dentists in training (residents), and recent dental graduates (interns) - could diagnose cases of periodontitis using a new system called the 2017 Periodontal Classification. A group of expert periodontists created a "gold-standard" diagnosis for comparison. We found that periodontists were the most accurate, while interns had more difficulty correctly identifying disease severity. Across all groups, many participants underestimated how serious the cases were. Participants were better at recognizing advanced disease compared to milder forms. When the participants repeated the diagnosis of the cases later, their accuracy improved, suggesting that practice and training help. Our results show that diagnosing gum disease can vary depending on experience and training. The study highlights the need for ongoing education and practice to make sure that all dental professionals can diagnose gum disease reliably, which is important for making treatment decisions and improving patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Periodontology
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.70011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and consistency in applying the 2017 periodontal classification among dental professionals

Arwa Badahdah, Lina Bahanan, Amal Jamjoom, Arwa A. Banjar et al.
1 citations
Journal of Periodontology
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
1.47
article

Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and consistency in applying the 2017 periodontal classification among dental professionals

Arwa Badahdah, Lina Bahanan, Amal Jamjoom, Arwa A. Banjar, Mohammad Assaggaf, Brian L. Mealey, Shatha Bamashmous, Reem Alsulami, Reem A. Asiri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Understanding gum disease correctly is important for providing patients with the right treatments. This study looked at how accurately different groups of dental professionals - specialists in gum disease (periodontists), dentists in training (residents), and recent dental graduates (interns) - could diagnose cases of periodontitis using a new system called the 2017 Periodontal Classification. A group of expert periodontists created a "gold-standard" diagnosis for comparison. We found that periodontists were the most accurate, while interns had more difficulty correctly identifying disease severity. Across all groups, many participants underestimated how serious the cases were. Participants were better at recognizing advanced disease compared to milder forms. When the participants repeated the diagnosis of the cases later, their accuracy improved, suggesting that practice and training help. Our results show that diagnosing gum disease can vary depending on experience and training. The study highlights the need for ongoing education and practice to make sure that all dental professionals can diagnose gum disease reliably, which is important for making treatment decisions and improving patient care.

Journal of Periodontology
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.