Scoping Review of ML Approaches in Anxiety Detection from In-Lab to In-the-Wild

The field of anxiety detection and use of machine learning (ML) has experienced rapid growth necessitating an updated review of commonly used ML models and their performance, anxiety-inducing methodologies, data collection conditions, and dataset utilization. Feature-based ML models have been extensively employed due to their interpretability and simplicity. However, these models require manual feature engineering, which can be labor-intensive and potentially biased. End-to-end deep learning models have emerged as alternatives, capable of utilizing raw signal directly and handling large datasets. This review aims to provide a detailed exploration of anxiety detection using ML, including use of feature-based vs. end-to-end models, a taxonomy of stressors, performance benchmarks, challenges in deployment to real-world scenarios, and generalizability of findings, given limitations in sociodemographic diversity and heterogeneity in the use of validated anxiety measures. A total of 105 eligible papers were retrieved from the Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed databases. Stressors were categorized into six distinct types—social, mental, physical, emotional, driving, and daily-life stressors—to provide a better overview of methodologies used to elicit anxiety. Papers were organized according to the type of data collection—lab-based or real-world conditions—and characterized through the type of anxiety instrument used, population examined, and classification performance. This review underscores the need for further investigation into model architecture and their suitability for different types of data, limitations in population diversity and representation in existing studies, and advocating for a more nuanced and personalized approach to anxiety detection using machine learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810099
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scoping Review of ML Approaches in Anxiety Detection from In-Lab to In-the-Wild

Richard B. Sowers, Manuel E. Hernandez, Jean L. Clore, Maxine He et al.
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Emotion and Mood Recognition
2.12
article

Scoping Review of ML Approaches in Anxiety Detection from In-Lab to In-the-Wild

Richard B. Sowers, Manuel E. Hernandez, Jean L. Clore, Maxine He, Abdulrahman Alkurdi, Elizabeth T. Hsiao‐Wecksler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The field of anxiety detection and use of machine learning (ML) has experienced rapid growth necessitating an updated review of commonly used ML models and their performance, anxiety-inducing methodologies, data collection conditions, and dataset utilization. Feature-based ML models have been extensively employed due to their interpretability and simplicity. However, these models require manual feature engineering, which can be labor-intensive and potentially biased. End-to-end deep learning models have emerged as alternatives, capable of utilizing raw signal directly and handling large datasets. This review aims to provide a detailed exploration of anxiety detection using ML, including use of feature-based vs. end-to-end models, a taxonomy of stressors, performance benchmarks, challenges in deployment to real-world scenarios, and generalizability of findings, given limitations in sociodemographic diversity and heterogeneity in the use of validated anxiety measures. A total of 105 eligible papers were retrieved from the Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed databases. Stressors were categorized into six distinct types—social, mental, physical, emotional, driving, and daily-life stressors—to provide a better overview of methodologies used to elicit anxiety. Papers were organized according to the type of data collection—lab-based or real-world conditions—and characterized through the type of anxiety instrument used, population examined, and classification performance. This review underscores the need for further investigation into model architecture and their suitability for different types of data, limitations in population diversity and representation in existing studies, and advocating for a more nuanced and personalized approach to anxiety detection using machine learning.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(18)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Illinois College (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Peoria campus of the University of Illinois System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Emotion and Mood Recognition
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.