Carbon Footprint Comparison and Environmental Impact Analysis of Ternary Lithium-Ion and Lithium Iron Phosphate Power Batteries

Ternary lithium-ion and lithium iron phosphate power batteries are widely used on electric vehicles in China. However, the development of their carbon footprint assessment systems is still in its initial stage. This paper calculates the carbon footprints of commonly used ternary lithium-ion and lithium iron phosphate power batteries and analyzes their ecological impacts on the environment. Life cycle of the power batteries are divided into production and usage, and the inventory data of the battery in two stages are collected according to 1 kWh unit. The software Simapro and the IPCC 2021 GWP 100 carbon footprint calculation method are used to calculate the carbon footprint. The results show that the carbon footprint contribution of ternary lithium-ion batteries is the largest in the production stage, accounting for 75.8% of the total carbon footprint. This is because three precious metals (cobalt, nickel and manganese) account for a large proportion of the carbon footprint. For lithium iron phosphate batteries, the carbon footprint contribution is the largest in the usage stage, accounting for 59% of the total carbon footprint, mainly due to the low proportion of green power in China’s power system. A comparison of the total carbon emissions of two types of batteries shows that the total emissions of lithium iron phosphate batteries are generally half of those of ternary lithium-ion batteries, indicating that lithium iron phosphate batteries are superior to ternary lithium-ion batteries in terms of ecological impact on the environmental.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18184914
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Footprint Comparison and Environmental Impact Analysis of Ternary Lithium-Ion and Lithium Iron Phosphate Power Batteries

Zhilong Wei, H.S. Zhen, Hao Zhang
1 citations
Energies
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
article

Carbon Footprint Comparison and Environmental Impact Analysis of Ternary Lithium-Ion and Lithium Iron Phosphate Power Batteries

Zhilong Wei, H.S. Zhen, Hao Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Ternary lithium-ion and lithium iron phosphate power batteries are widely used on electric vehicles in China. However, the development of their carbon footprint assessment systems is still in its initial stage. This paper calculates the carbon footprints of commonly used ternary lithium-ion and lithium iron phosphate power batteries and analyzes their ecological impacts on the environment. Life cycle of the power batteries are divided into production and usage, and the inventory data of the battery in two stages are collected according to 1 kWh unit. The software Simapro and the IPCC 2021 GWP 100 carbon footprint calculation method are used to calculate the carbon footprint. The results show that the carbon footprint contribution of ternary lithium-ion batteries is the largest in the production stage, accounting for 75.8% of the total carbon footprint. This is because three precious metals (cobalt, nickel and manganese) account for a large proportion of the carbon footprint. For lithium iron phosphate batteries, the carbon footprint contribution is the largest in the usage stage, accounting for 59% of the total carbon footprint, mainly due to the low proportion of green power in China’s power system. A comparison of the total carbon emissions of two types of batteries shows that the total emissions of lithium iron phosphate batteries are generally half of those of ternary lithium-ion batteries, indicating that lithium iron phosphate batteries are superior to ternary lithium-ion batteries in terms of ecological impact on the environmental.

EnergiesVol. 18(18)
Hainan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.