Optimizing clinical scientific research: the cohort intervention random sampling study with historical controls

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are regarded as the highest level of evidence in medical research, but RCTs also have their drawbacks. Over the years, several alternative study designs have been introduced to address these problems. However, many of the alternative designs are often regarded as inferior to RCTs or currently not suitable for widespread implementation due to, for example, ethical or statistical problems. Thus, there is a need for study designs that have the same level of validity as RCTs, but are also suitable for large-scale implementation. The cohort intervention random sampling study (CIRSS) with historical controls meets these requirements, by combining the strengths of abovementioned designs. The CIRSS with historical controls has the potential to optimize implementation of promising new treatments as fluidly and rapidly as possible, representing real-world clinical population. Further research is required to address the range of analyses, implementation, issues, barriers and facilitators and ethical questions related to CIRSS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0168
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing clinical scientific research: the cohort intervention random sampling study with historical controls

Edwin R. van den Heuvel, S. Guid Oei, Myrthe van der Ven, M. Beatrijs van der Hout‐van der Jagt et al.
2 citations
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
5.26
article

Optimizing clinical scientific research: the cohort intervention random sampling study with historical controls

Edwin R. van den Heuvel, S. Guid Oei, Myrthe van der Ven, M. Beatrijs van der Hout‐van der Jagt, Judith O. E. H. van Laar, Annemarie Fransen, Nadine D de Klerk, Phebe B. Q. Berben
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are regarded as the highest level of evidence in medical research, but RCTs also have their drawbacks. Over the years, several alternative study designs have been introduced to address these problems. However, many of the alternative designs are often regarded as inferior to RCTs or currently not suitable for widespread implementation due to, for example, ethical or statistical problems. Thus, there is a need for study designs that have the same level of validity as RCTs, but are also suitable for large-scale implementation. The cohort intervention random sampling study (CIRSS) with historical controls meets these requirements, by combining the strengths of abovementioned designs. The CIRSS with historical controls has the potential to optimize implementation of promising new treatments as fluidly and rapidly as possible, representing real-world clinical population. Further research is required to address the range of analyses, implementation, issues, barriers and facilitators and ethical questions related to CIRSS.

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness ResearchVol. 14(11)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Máxima Medisch Centrum (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
5.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.