Comparative Prognostic Evaluation of the Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2023 and 2009 Staging Systems in Early Endometrial Cancer

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: We comparatively evaluated the prognostic performance of the 2009 and 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging systems for early-stage endometrial cancer based on histological subtype stratification. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective cohort of 472 patients with FIGO 2009 stage I-II between 2004 and 2019 was analyzed. Patients were restaged using both systems. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were determined according to histopathological aggressiveness. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank testing compared the performance of the systems. Cox proportional hazards regression identified independent prognostic factors. A hypothetical modification of the FIGO 2023 system was evaluated for aggressive subtypes. <b>Results</b>: In all, 388 patients had nonaggressive histology, and 84 patients had aggressive histology. For cases of nonaggressive histology, FIGO 2023 demonstrated superior prognostic discrimination for OS and RFS (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas FIGO 2009 showed significant stratification for OS (<i>p</i> < 0.001) but not RFS (<i>p</i> = 0.149). For cases of aggressive histology, FIGO 2009 showed significant stratification for RFS (<i>p</i> = 0.017) but not OS (<i>p</i> = 0.31), whereas FIGO 2023 showed no significant stratification for either endpoint. The hypothetical modification of the FIGO 2023 staging system showed significantly improved discrimination for RFS (<i>p</i> = 0.019) but not OS. Multivariate analysis identified age and lymphovascular space invasion as independent prognostic factors in nonaggressive cancers, whereas cervical stromal involvement was significant in aggressive subtypes. <b>Conclusions</b>: The prognostic utility of the FIGO staging system is histology dependent. Although FIGO 2023 offers enhanced risk stratification for nonaggressive endometrial cancers, its discriminatory power for aggressive subtypes remains limited, indicating the need for histology-specific refinements of future staging frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17183017
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Prognostic Evaluation of the Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2023 and 2009 Staging Systems in Early Endometrial Cancer

Hokun Kim, Yu Ri Shin, Sung Eun Rha, Su Lim Lee
Cancers
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Comparative Prognostic Evaluation of the Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2023 and 2009 Staging Systems in Early Endometrial Cancer

Hokun Kim, Yu Ri Shin, Sung Eun Rha, Su Lim Lee
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: We comparatively evaluated the prognostic performance of the 2009 and 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging systems for early-stage endometrial cancer based on histological subtype stratification. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective cohort of 472 patients with FIGO 2009 stage I-II between 2004 and 2019 was analyzed. Patients were restaged using both systems. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were determined according to histopathological aggressiveness. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank testing compared the performance of the systems. Cox proportional hazards regression identified independent prognostic factors. A hypothetical modification of the FIGO 2023 system was evaluated for aggressive subtypes. <b>Results</b>: In all, 388 patients had nonaggressive histology, and 84 patients had aggressive histology. For cases of nonaggressive histology, FIGO 2023 demonstrated superior prognostic discrimination for OS and RFS (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas FIGO 2009 showed significant stratification for OS (<i>p</i> < 0.001) but not RFS (<i>p</i> = 0.149). For cases of aggressive histology, FIGO 2009 showed significant stratification for RFS (<i>p</i> = 0.017) but not OS (<i>p</i> = 0.31), whereas FIGO 2023 showed no significant stratification for either endpoint. The hypothetical modification of the FIGO 2023 staging system showed significantly improved discrimination for RFS (<i>p</i> = 0.019) but not OS. Multivariate analysis identified age and lymphovascular space invasion as independent prognostic factors in nonaggressive cancers, whereas cervical stromal involvement was significant in aggressive subtypes. <b>Conclusions</b>: The prognostic utility of the FIGO staging system is histology dependent. Although FIGO 2023 offers enhanced risk stratification for nonaggressive endometrial cancers, its discriminatory power for aggressive subtypes remains limited, indicating the need for histology-specific refinements of future staging frameworks.

CancersVol. 17(18)
St. Mary's Hospital (US), The Catholic University of Korea Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.