Monogamy of Entanglement of Maximal Dimension

Abstract In the present study, a trade off of sharing of entanglement between subsystems of a higher dimensional quantum state is derived. It is presented in terms of an inequality which is analogous to the Coffman–Kundu–Wootters inequality that succinctly describes monogamy of entanglement in dimensional pure state. To derive the monogamy inequality in dimension, G‐concurrence measure of entanglement is considered as a measure of entanglement of maximal dimension. The approach of the present study incidentally points toward a rigorous framework which enables to obtain an upper bound of G‐concurrence of a bipartite qudit mixed state. Obtained upper bound of G‐concurrence is then shown to satisfy a monogamy relation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annalen der Physik
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.202500216
Primary Topic
advanced mathematical theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monogamy of Entanglement of Maximal Dimension

Sumit Nandi
Annalen der Physik
advanced mathematical theories
article

Monogamy of Entanglement of Maximal Dimension

Sumit Nandi
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the present study, a trade off of sharing of entanglement between subsystems of a higher dimensional quantum state is derived. It is presented in terms of an inequality which is analogous to the Coffman–Kundu–Wootters inequality that succinctly describes monogamy of entanglement in dimensional pure state. To derive the monogamy inequality in dimension, G‐concurrence measure of entanglement is considered as a measure of entanglement of maximal dimension. The approach of the present study incidentally points toward a rigorous framework which enables to obtain an upper bound of G‐concurrence of a bipartite qudit mixed state. Obtained upper bound of G‐concurrence is then shown to satisfy a monogamy relation.

Annalen der PhysikVol. 537(12)
Altran (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
advanced mathematical theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.