Do Engine‐Specific Tax Programs Work? A Structural Analysis of Market Spillovers and Welfare Implications

ABSTRACT This paper examines engine‐specific tax programs that are widely used in developing countries to limit car emissions. Using China's tax abatement program for small vehicles in 2015, we find significant price and sales responses for both small and large vehicles, indicating strong competition spillovers. The quantification model shows that an increase in car ownership generates more car emissions than the reduction resulting from the relocation from large to small vehicles. Welfare analysis further shows that the reduced government tax revenue and increased car emissions significantly outweigh the increased household welfare and firm profits, rendering the engine‐specific tax program socially unbeneficial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Economic Review
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.70021
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Engine‐Specific Tax Programs Work? A Structural Analysis of Market Spillovers and Welfare Implications

Yi Lu, Pei Li, Jiasheng Li
International Economic Review
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
article

Do Engine‐Specific Tax Programs Work? A Structural Analysis of Market Spillovers and Welfare Implications

Yi Lu, Pei Li, Jiasheng Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines engine‐specific tax programs that are widely used in developing countries to limit car emissions. Using China's tax abatement program for small vehicles in 2015, we find significant price and sales responses for both small and large vehicles, indicating strong competition spillovers. The quantification model shows that an increase in car ownership generates more car emissions than the reduction resulting from the relocation from large to small vehicles. Welfare analysis further shows that the reduced government tax revenue and increased car emissions significantly outweigh the increased household welfare and firm profits, rendering the engine‐specific tax program socially unbeneficial.

International Economic ReviewVol. 67(1)
Renmin University of China (CN), Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do Engine‐Specific Tax Programs Work? A Structural Analysis of Market Spillovers and Welfare Implications — Yi Lu, Pei Li, et al. · International Economic Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS