The holistic effect of nature of science and science process skills on students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge and motivation within the context of modified guided discovery in physics laboratory

Literature emphasizes integrating nature of science (NOS), science process skills (SPS), and varied laboratory activities within guided discovery methods to enhance learning, yet empirical evidence on their synergistic effects remains scarce. This study involved a phase III tandem design with three treatment pair match groups, using a quasi-experimental approach and assessed the combined impact of <i>modified guided discovery methods</i> using implicit NOS integration, explicit approach of SPS, and diverse labs on academic achievement (conceptual/procedural knowledge) and motivation among 88 Ethiopian college students. ANCOVA and multiple regression analyses showed non-significant individual effects for NOS (*p* = 0.702 on conceptual, 0.842 on procedural, 0.986 on motivation), pedagogy (*p* = 0.830, 0.635, 0.759), and SPS (*p* = 0.568, 0.880, 0.952) on conceptual, procedural, and motivation, respectively. Interaction effects (NOS, SPS, and<i> </i>pedagogy) were also non-significant across outcomes (*p* > 0.05). However, substantial Partial eta-squared values indicated meaningful practical effects: individually, NOS (η² = 0.865 on conceptual, 0.815 on procedural, 0.658 on motivation) and SPS (η² = 0.894 on conceptual, 0.788 on procedural, 0.724 on motivation) strongly influenced outcomes; interactively, NOS*SPS had large effects on conceptual knowledge (η² = 0.711) and moderate effects on procedural knowledge (η² = 0.521) and motivation (η² = 0.524). This divergence between statistical non-significance and large effect sizes suggests the instructional model meaningfully impacts learning despite null hypothesis test results. We recommend: (1) curricular refinements to amplify effects, (2) application in diverse learning environments, and (3) supplementing traditional assessments with performance-based evaluations to better capture gains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17035
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The holistic effect of nature of science and science process skills on students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge and motivation within the context of modified guided discovery in physics laboratory

Tsedeke Abate, Shimeles Assefa, Desta Gebeyehu, Adisu Daniel
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

The holistic effect of nature of science and science process skills on students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge and motivation within the context of modified guided discovery in physics laboratory

Tsedeke Abate, Shimeles Assefa, Desta Gebeyehu, Adisu Daniel
article en

Abstract

Literature emphasizes integrating nature of science (NOS), science process skills (SPS), and varied laboratory activities within guided discovery methods to enhance learning, yet empirical evidence on their synergistic effects remains scarce. This study involved a phase III tandem design with three treatment pair match groups, using a quasi-experimental approach and assessed the combined impact of <i>modified guided discovery methods</i> using implicit NOS integration, explicit approach of SPS, and diverse labs on academic achievement (conceptual/procedural knowledge) and motivation among 88 Ethiopian college students. ANCOVA and multiple regression analyses showed non-significant individual effects for NOS (*p* = 0.702 on conceptual, 0.842 on procedural, 0.986 on motivation), pedagogy (*p* = 0.830, 0.635, 0.759), and SPS (*p* = 0.568, 0.880, 0.952) on conceptual, procedural, and motivation, respectively. Interaction effects (NOS, SPS, and<i> </i>pedagogy) were also non-significant across outcomes (*p* > 0.05). However, substantial Partial eta-squared values indicated meaningful practical effects: individually, NOS (η² = 0.865 on conceptual, 0.815 on procedural, 0.658 on motivation) and SPS (η² = 0.894 on conceptual, 0.788 on procedural, 0.724 on motivation) strongly influenced outcomes; interactively, NOS*SPS had large effects on conceptual knowledge (η² = 0.711) and moderate effects on procedural knowledge (η² = 0.521) and motivation (η² = 0.524). This divergence between statistical non-significance and large effect sizes suggests the instructional model meaningfully impacts learning despite null hypothesis test results. We recommend: (1) curricular refinements to amplify effects, (2) application in diverse learning environments, and (3) supplementing traditional assessments with performance-based evaluations to better capture gains.

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology EducationVol. 21(10)
Hosan University (KR), Arba Minch University (ET), Addis Ababa University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.