Evaluation of Morris Board Queen Rearing Technique in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia

The Agricultural Research Center of Adami Tulu, Ethiopia, conducted experiments to artificially rear bee queens using Morris Board and Splitting-methods. Six colonies of bees were randomly assigned to conduct experiments. In three honeybee colonies, the queens were isolated during the experiment and remained in Brood Chamber/Box using a screen board, while the remaining colonies were split to rear the queens. The two methods of breeding the honeybee queen show a very significant difference (P0.001) in the number of cells constructed, the number of sealed honeybee queen cells, and the number of egg/producing honeybee queens. In addition, there was very significant difference (P0.001) between the two methods used in the cost-benefit aspect. The honeybee queen was found to have cost significantly reduced when raising the honeybee queen with Morris boards compared to a split one. However, the current experiment does not have a significant difference in honeybee bred populations and honey yield, and other honeybee colonies receive young queens raised in two ways. It follows that Morris-board's honeybee breeding techniques are highly effective and cost-effective in producing honeybee queens for the multiplication of honeybee colonies to the best of ordinary farmers' skills and financial capabilities. Therefore, demonstration of technology is of principally important considering the country's widespread biophysical differences in order to exploit the technology in an attempt to artificially grow honeybee queens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Published
2025-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20251003.12
Primary Topic
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Morris Board Queen Rearing Technique in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia

Desta Gemedi, Mekonnen Wolditsadik Beyi, Taye Lema
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
article

Evaluation of Morris Board Queen Rearing Technique in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia

Desta Gemedi, Mekonnen Wolditsadik Beyi, Taye Lema
article en

Abstract

The Agricultural Research Center of Adami Tulu, Ethiopia, conducted experiments to artificially rear bee queens using Morris Board and Splitting-methods. Six colonies of bees were randomly assigned to conduct experiments. In three honeybee colonies, the queens were isolated during the experiment and remained in Brood Chamber/Box using a screen board, while the remaining colonies were split to rear the queens. The two methods of breeding the honeybee queen show a very significant difference (P0.001) in the number of cells constructed, the number of sealed honeybee queen cells, and the number of egg/producing honeybee queens. In addition, there was very significant difference (P0.001) between the two methods used in the cost-benefit aspect. The honeybee queen was found to have cost significantly reduced when raising the honeybee queen with Morris boards compared to a split one. However, the current experiment does not have a significant difference in honeybee bred populations and honey yield, and other honeybee colonies receive young queens raised in two ways. It follows that Morris-board's honeybee breeding techniques are highly effective and cost-effective in producing honeybee queens for the multiplication of honeybee colonies to the best of ordinary farmers' skills and financial capabilities. Therefore, demonstration of technology is of principally important considering the country's widespread biophysical differences in order to exploit the technology in an attempt to artificially grow honeybee queens.

Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyVol. 10(3)
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.